Hi,
> You asked Guix to build something, so it's not surprising to me that it
> might need to download some source code to do that.
>
> Can you spell out more clearly what you expected to happen differently,
> and why you think Guix is acting improperly here?
>
> Thanks,
>Mark
Orig
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It’s currently being evaluated:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-next
Thanks, although I guess all of the builds will fail, unless someone
manually added the new bootstrap tarballs to Berlin's store, or uploaded
them to one of the URLs in %bo
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> You can reproduce them with the following command from a git checkout at
> commit 9e6256ba0f32ab12d61c914a3fed879dac881762, which is the tip of the
> 'wip-binaries' branch, based on recent 'master':
>
> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux bootstrap-t
Earlier, I wrote:
> I pushed those two commits to 'core-updates-next', and am currently
> building out that branch on my X200. So far I've successfully built the
> core packages and 'hello', and am now continuing on to build the rest of
> my Guix system.
FYI, on 'core-updates-next', I've built t
Installing only 'ghc 8.6.5' (Glasgow Haskell compiler) and sourcing
'~/.guix-profile/etc/profile' leads to ghc not finding core modules.
('ghci' doesn't find System.IO for instance).
This is due to $GHC_PACKAGE_PATH not containing ghc 8.6.5's
package.conf.d, but
instead ghc 8.4.3's database.
N
---
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
index d5e46e09c1..1a091de938 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2019 Giaco
---
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
index d5e46e09c1..1a091de938 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2019 Giaco
ison writes:
> I do have a /boot/grub actually. Is that strange?
> It looks like a normal /boot/grub to me, and contains a grub.cfg
I think that's normal -- my virtual machine had one, too.
> Sounds good, I'll reinstall it over the weekend
Thank you :)
Regards,
JAkob
signature.asc
Descripti
