Hi Janneke,
>> I'm unsure how to proceed. Can someone please help me independently
>> verify these binaries?
>
> Yeah, I don't know...Do I dare to suggest you give it a retry?
It built successfully on the second attempt. I'm curious what happened,
but not quite curious enough to investigate fur
Hello!
I noticed that ‘guix lint -c source’ would incorrectly treat redirects
as errors:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix lint -c source iml
gnu/packages/algebra.scm:1508:5: warning: iml@1.0.5: all the source URIs are
unreachable:
gnu/packag
Hello,
Robert Vollmert skribis:
> Not sure who’s at fault here, but without doing anything weird,
> I ended up with a system where shepherd thought that nginx was
> stopped, while there was still an nginx process around. I
> certainly didn’t start it by hand.
Did you try “herd status nginx” to
Hello,
Chris Marusich writes:
> swedebu...@riseup.net writes:
>
>> On 2018-12-09 13:06, swedebu...@riseup.net wrote:
>>> When I set the time or toggle automatic time in the gnome-control-center
>>> it errors out. The time is still wrong.
>>>
>>> sdb@antelope ~$ gnome-control-center
>>>
>>> (g
Hi,
Rene writes:
> Hello,
>
> I think that this bug is solved with commits(master branch):
>
>>From `92deb5cc920fcc7617302986180f1abee5fd2b2` to
> `48c8d067d4ded776939cda6f9c63c25b38ba77fc`, using the GDM service.
I agree. I’ve been using the lock screen with the hotkey for a while
now. Closi
Mark H Weaver writes:
Hello Mark,
> I'd like to start compiling 'core-updates' on my machine, but first I
> wish to independently verify the new bootstrap binaries. I'm running
> into difficulties with that.
Good that you are verifying this. IIRC, Ludo' has verified all
bootstrap binaries that
Not sure who’s at fault here, but without doing anything weird,
I ended up with a system where shepherd thought that nginx was
stopped, while there was still an nginx process around. I
certainly didn’t start it by hand.
The result was this:
$ sudo herd restart nginx
Service nginx is not running.
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Robert Vollmert skribis:
>
>>> On 26. Jun 2019, at 22:23, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:51:41PM +0200, Björn Höfling wrote:
What's the conclusion? Maybe that Guix is fine and the VNC-clients are
also fine. It mi
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>> Illegal instruction? This uses JamVM 2.0.0 as the JVM. I’ll try to
>>> figure out what instruction this is and where it comes from.
>>
>> I hit the same bug now.
>
> Good. We need to figure out why – is it miscompilation? Tuning to a
> different CPU type…?
With t
On 2019-07-19 17:53, swedebugia wrote:
Hi
Today I tried to remove noise.
I failed because the dialog blocked the main application while at the
same time telling me to select noise for the profile.
Weird.
Can someone reproduce?
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/3v8d8ljnk8smrl6l4mhx1fpdw1y9fn
Hi
Today I tried to remove noise.
I failed because the dialog blocked the main application while at the
same time telling me to select noise for the profile.
Weird.
Can someone reproduce?
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/3v8d8ljnk8smrl6l4mhx1fpdw1y9fn8f-audacity-2.2.2...
audacity-2.2.2
$
Hi Gábor,
> Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2019. júl. 19., P,
> 8:09):
>
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> > Here’s a shorter patch:
>> >
>> > --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm
>> > index 403c446a8
Hello,
Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2019. júl. 19., P,
8:09):
>
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> > Here’s a shorter patch:
> >
> > --8<---cut here---start->8---
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm
> > index 403c446a82..bd98784232 100
Hello,
Robert Vollmert skribis:
>> On 26. Jun 2019, at 22:23, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:51:41PM +0200, Björn Höfling wrote:
>>> What's the conclusion? Maybe that Guix is fine and the VNC-clients are
>>> also fine. It might just be a matter of config
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Here’s a shorter patch:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm
> index 403c446a82..bd98784232 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/java.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/java.scm
> @@ -152,6 +152,1
Chris Marusich writes:
> is there anything we can check to understand why the database
> corruption has occurred?
[…]
> For the record, I do sometimes abruptly power off my machine, and it
> does rarely abruptly crash (I think I have reported this when it occurs,
> but I can't be sure).
This c
16 matches
Mail list logo
