Ludovic Courtès writes:
> The difference comes from the fact that ‘gnu-make-explicit-inputs’ has
> Guile in its ‘inputs’:
Ah, I missed that!
> scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-direct-inputs gnu-make-explicit-inputs)
> $5 = (("libc" # 3d216c0>) ("gcc" # 3d21600>) ("binutils" # gnu/packages/b
Hi Eric,
We’re almost there! :-)
Eric Brown skribis:
> Thank you for your fixes! I've attached a revised patch. I'm well beyond
> my comfort zone, so I hope it applies cleanly and works.
>
> The default location of pymolcas is a little sketchy, being placed in
> the first writable location in
Hello!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> 11:56:03 janneke@dundal:~/src/guix-master
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix graph --type=bag -e '(begin (use-modules (guix
> packages)) (@@ (gnu packages pawei) gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs))' | wc -l
> 14
> 11:56:22 janneke@dundal:~/src/guix-master
> $ ./pre-inst-env
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Should `package-with-explicit-inputs' behave like I think it does, i.e.,
> should both test packages list the same dependencies, or am I missing
> something?
Printing the packages in the Guix Repl gives this result
--8<---cut here---start--
Clément Lassieur writes:
> Clément Lassieur writes:
>
>> Scrolling (with the trackpad) doesn't work after a certain amount of
>> time on one tab only. Then if I refresh the tab, it works again.
>
> I forgot to say that scrolling with the scrollbar (on the right) still
> works.
Can you try to d
Hi!
Rewriting the bootstrap on the wip-bootstrap branch I found additional
inputs in packages that use `package-with-explicit-inputs', such as
diffutils-boot0.
I would expect diffutils-boot0 to list just one extra input in addition
to gnu-make-boot0; namely the package gnu-make-boot0; however it
