2017-06-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil :
>
I'm fine with investigating the missing parts before or after moving to
> guix-artwork.git.
>
For what it's worth, I vouch for moving all to gnu.org and possibly
expressing the issues in the appropriate debbugs instance
Then, I might be able to collaborat
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:56:17AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> $ guix package -e '(@@ (gnu packages tex) texlive-texmf)' -n
> The following package would be installed:
>texlive-texmf2016
> /gnu/store/qnz85bcaw89
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>>From e7f464bac58e1f09de5ceb194c4a30f6d899b29a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?=
> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:03:54 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] syscalls: Add 'scandir/utf-8'.
>
> * guix/build/syscalls.scm (%struct-dirent-heade
On 16/06/17 02:05, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> sirgazil skribis:
>
>> On 15/06/17 02:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> [...]
>
>>> On a more practical level, what would you like the workflow to be like
>>> from there on? I would prefer hosting the source on gnu.org rather than
>>> {bitbucket,g
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.4K bytes:
> Hi ng0,
>
> ng0 skribis:
>
> > gnunet-fuse 'picks' the first gnunet it finds in the /gnu/store/:
> >
> > checking for fuse.h... yes
> > checking for GNUnet core...
> > /gnu/store/01ja9wj2v48y5www5bhpmkx94wc4b553-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f
> > checking for
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Guix requests a substitute for “texlive-texmf” even though it is marked
> as not substitutable. This is a problem for many users because hydra
> does not offer a substitute for this package. Users have to pass
> “--fallback” to make Guix build the package from source.
Hi ng0,
ng0 skribis:
> gnunet-fuse 'picks' the first gnunet it finds in the /gnu/store/:
>
> checking for fuse.h... yes
> checking for GNUnet core...
> /gnu/store/01ja9wj2v48y5www5bhpmkx94wc4b553-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f
> checking for GNUnet util library in
> /gnu/store/01ja9wj2v48y5www5bhpmk
Howdy!
sirgazil skribis:
> On 15/06/17 02:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> On a more practical level, what would you like the workflow to be like
>> from there on? I would prefer hosting the source on gnu.org rather than
>> {bitbucket,gitlab,github}.com and I would also prefer Git over
>>
