Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> Alex Kost (2017-06-05) wrote:
>
>> Arun Isaac (2017-06-05) wrote:
>
>> > Please make any other changes you think are necessary, and push. Thanks!
>
>> Thanks, but I'm afraid I'm not competent to judge about the first
>> patch. I don't really know what is use
Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> skribis:
>>> As of now [0] a search path ‘GUIX_LOCPATH’ is exported when ‘glibc’
>>> package, which does not comprise any locales, is installed. I guess,
>>> it should belong to ‘glibc-locales’ and ‘glibc-utf8-locales’ instead.
>>
>> The idea of search path sp
Hi Danny,
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:36:28 +0200
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> What happens with other bootloaders? Do we get older boot entries?
>
> Yes, but U-Boot has no support for submenus, only one menu [1].
> Extlinux-the-format technically doe
Alex Kost writes:
> Sure, I didn't mean I was ignored, I just wanted to say that I got the
> same thought about those arguments as Maxim.
No hard feelings! :-) debbugs can be a pain to read. I thought you
missed that message from me.
> As I said, I think this duplication can be avoided simply b
Hello Ludovic,
Alex Kost (2017-06-05) wrote:
> Arun Isaac (2017-06-05) wrote:
> > Please make any other changes you think are necessary, and push. Thanks!
> Thanks, but I'm afraid I'm not competent to judge about the first
> patch. I don't really know what is used on build side and on host sid
> What happens with other bootloaders? Do we get older boot entries? It
> might be worth mentioning.
On extlinux we also get older boot entries but not in a submenu. I plan
to add submenu support in a new serie.
I'll mention that this is true for all supported bootloaders when this
will be don
Hi Ludo,
> Do we still need ‘device-mount-point’ now? For the dual-boot use case,
> I don’t see how this would be used.
Nope, you're right it's not needed in .
>> + (initrd (menu-entry-initrd menu-entry
>
> It’s weird to set ‘store-device’ and ‘store-mount-point’ here since
> there’s no