On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:29:41PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
> pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug
- Forwarded message from Quiliro -
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:52:00 -0500
From: Quiliro
To: 25...@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25894: guix system reconfigure error
I get the following error after
guix pull
and
guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm
FAILURES:
--ion-eager
/tmp/guix-b
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Quiliro wrote:
> The bug report was closed. But the errors persist on a good network
> connection as reported in
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25894#38
That is a different problem from the one in your original report.
It's not related to
The bug report was closed. But the errors persist on a good network
connection as reported in
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25894#38
Nevertheless, both behaviors are problems:
- If the network lag breaks guix operations, then that is wrong.
- If the guix operations break with a goo
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 02:50:29PM -0500, Quiliro wrote:
> When using the same process with a good bandwidth connection, there is
> no problem with
> guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm
> or with
> guix pull
> or with sending emails in Claws-Mail
Okay, please re-open the bug if you experience
Git has a simple workflow for using email, with `git send-email` and
`git am`.
The guix-patches debbugs thing causes a regression in this workflow by
rewriting the commit messages to include the debbugs ticket number.
So, a commit that begins with this:
gnu: gitolite: Fix shebangs in hooks.
...
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:29:41PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
> > pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of
> > users who were stil
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of
users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0.
It seems unlikely that they have b
Hi!
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Hello! I'm getting this error while trying to compile latest guix
> master on one of my machines (fortunately, not my main one). I don't
> know why I'm hitting this error, since I'm not hitting it on my main
> machine. I'm upgrading from a few months bac
On 17-03-04 16:43:09, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Hi ng0,
>
> > I think there should be a reference to /gnu/store/ reddis and not
> > "/usr/sbin/redis-server". Different problem, related bug.. This can be
> > solved in a commit after this bug.
>
> Yeah.
>
> I would question why a normal applica
Hi ng0,
> I think there should be a reference to /gnu/store/ reddis and not
> "/usr/sbin/redis-server". Different problem, related bug.. This can be
> solved in a commit after this bug.
Yeah.
I would question why a normal application needs to start a redis *server* in
the first place. Sounds st
On 17-03-03 11:36:12, ng0 wrote:
> On 17-03-02 22:20:44, ng0 wrote:
> > On 17-03-02 16:58:35, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 03:00:13PM +, ng0 wrote:
> > > > This is the ~120 lines of today. It reminded me of the real issue, which
> > > > is dbus could not be started, which v
On 17-03-03 22:27:43, ng0 wrote:
> What makes this worse, with every update (push) of gitolite-admin
> repository the shebang of "hooks/update" is reset.
> Other repositories seem to keep changes in the hooks shebangs so
> far.
>
>
>
When I build gitolite from guix, this looks trivial to fix.
13 matches
Mail list logo
