bug#25831: Expose http_proxy setting on GuixSD

2017-02-22 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:15:12PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > +(list (string-append "PATH=" #$lsof "/bin") > > + #$@(if http-proxy > > + (list (string-append "http_proxy=" http-proxy)) > > +

bug#25831: Expose http_proxy setting on GuixSD

2017-02-22 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:51:47AM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: >> I don't know much about HTTP proxying but when reading >> 'in-band-download' in "guix/download.scm" I see a line like this: >> >> #:leaked-env-vars '("http_proxy" "https_proxy") >> >> which makes me thi

bug#25831: Expose http_proxy setting on GuixSD

2017-02-22 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:51:47AM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > I don't know much about HTTP proxying but when reading > 'in-band-download' in "guix/download.scm" I see a line like this: > > #:leaked-env-vars '("http_proxy" "https_proxy") > > which makes me think that maybe we should add an

bug#25177: python-tests: python-oslosphinx fixed. Please evaluate.

2017-02-22 Thread Marius Bakke
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:30:12PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: From 1ac5166df11766b47cd1ac723a464063a89afc96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:28:21 +0100

bug#25177: python-tests: python-oslosphinx fixed. Please evaluate.

2017-02-22 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:30:12PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> From 1ac5166df11766b47cd1ac723a464063a89afc96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Ricardo Wurmus >>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:28:21 +0100 >>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-dend

bug#25831: Expose http_proxy setting on GuixSD

2017-02-22 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Hi, Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:17:03PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: >> Not sure if this is an appropriate answer, but to customize the guix daemon >> service field like described in the example here: >> >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Using-the

bug#22629: Towards a new 'guix pull'

2017-02-22 Thread Pjotr Prins
I wrote up a 'white paper' on a new implementation of Guix channels. The easy on the eyes version you can read here: https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/proposals/channel.org * On Channels Related to debbugs https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22629 and https://debbug