On 2016-11-23 16:45, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello!
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
There are other errors not related to the document type declaration in
the packages-related pages.[1][2] Mostly, obsolete elements or
attributes, and missing closing tags.
This is underway too, right?
Yes.
Hi,
Adonay Felipe Nogueira skribis:
> Tested the patch today
>
> It seems that, during the `install' phase, something tries to make
> "/etc/samba" directory.
[...]
> File
> "/tmp/guix-build-samba-4.5.1.drv-0/samba-4.5.1/third_party/waf/wafadmin/Utils.py",
> line 458, in check_dir
> rai
Hello!
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
> Steps to reproduce
> ==
>
> 1. Go to https://validator.w3.org/
> 2. For each page in the website: validate by URI
>
>
> Unexpected behavior
> ===
>
> All pages are marked as [Invalid]
Oops.
> Most of the errors happen
Hello!
(And apologies Christopher for not replying earlier!)
I’m happy to report that this issue is finally fixed in
f7f292d359e0eb77617f4ecf6b3164f868ec1784!
The complete list of relevant commits is this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
f7f292d * install: Enab
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:25:27AM -0900, Christopher Howard wrote:
> The error is:
>
> "
> guix substitute: error: download from
> 'https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/nar/zrwslk773<...snip...>e2fsck-static-1.42.13'
> failed 410, "Gone"
> killing process 859
> guix system: error: build failed: some subs
The error is:
"
guix substitute: error: download from
'https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/nar/zrwslk773<...snip...>e2fsck-static-1.42.13'
failed 410, "Gone"
killing process 859
guix system: error: build failed: some substitutes for the outputs of
derivation `/gnu/store/kjzga<...snip...>-e2fsck-static-1.
Hi. What I remember happening was that on some package I got an error
something like "could not get package such-and-such, may be caused by
network errors" which wasn't fixed by running the command again. Then I
ran with --fallback as recommended, but then it seemed to be building
the entire gnome
Tested the patch today
It seems that, during the `install' phase, something tries to make
"/etc/samba" directory.
The log from the start of the error is attached.
I did `guix build samba` as normal user, and since I'm new to this
situation, I must ask: should I run it as root instead? Or should
Tested the patch today
It seems that, during the `install' phase, something tries to make
"/etc/samba" directory.
The log from the start of the error is attached.
I did `guix build samba` as normal user, and since I'm new to this
situation, I must ask: should I run it as root instead? Or should
