bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:00:58PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:53:08PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > > OK with these changes. > > Done as a535e12226!

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:53:08PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > OK with these changes. Done as a535e12226!

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

Leo Famulari skribis: > Please find my latest patch attached. It seems to work for me! \o/ > From 18979451b1af7eebaa354c1753ad4c90af288589 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari > Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 13:41:21 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] services: Add urandom-seed-service. Add “Fixes

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:26:23PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Please find my latest patch attached. It seems to work for me! > > I'm currently reconfiguring my GuixSD system with this patch to make > sure bad things don't happen t

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Please find my latest patch attached. It seems to work for me! I'm currently reconfiguring my GuixSD system with this patch to make sure bad things don't happen the first time the user halts and the seed file does not exist. Or someth

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Please find my latest patch attached. It seems to work for me! I forgot to add a copyright line for myself in this version. I'll put it in for the next patch or when merging.

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 03:57:06PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Usually, the service’s value is a configuration object, but in this > case, the service’s value doesn’t matter, so you could simply write:

bug#23094: [PATCHv2] Re: bug#23094: icecat is missing a desktop file

Hi! I figured there’s already a desktop entry template in the source, and it’s more complete (it includes translations), hence this patch: diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm b/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm index 7e52534..2baf4d7 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.s

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >> Yes, it’s: >> >> (service TYPE VALUE) >> >> but I think there’s no meaningful value for this service, so you could >> do: >> >> (service urandom-seed-service-type #f) [...] > gnu/services/base

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:24:59PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Leo Famulari skribis: >> >> > I realized that we don't seem to be saving any of the entropy in the >> > kernel's random pool [0] across reboots. >> > >> > This means that for some period after boot, /dev

bug#23001: emacs in X has icons missing and throws warnings in tty

Well, now the gtk+ is linked with gdk-pixbuf+svg, with adwaita-icon-theme and shared-mime-info (used by gdk-pixbuf at runtime) all my Emacs toolbar icons are missing (empty), but without any warning.

bug#23195: fixed

fixed in commit de477809d773.

bug#23260: (wxmaxima) crash: GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' is not installed

Danny Milosavljevic writes: > I finally got to the bottom of it. > > It says: > > (wxmaxima:27910): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema > 'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' is not installed > > and it's right. I'm not sure how it's supposed to find them. > > On this GuixSD installation I only have

bug#23605: /dev/urandom not seeded across reboots

On 28/05/16 11:45, Leo Famulari wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:11:20AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Hi Leo, On 28/05/16 11:05, Leo Famulari wrote: Okay, I finally have some code that works! (attached) Is your patch incomplete? What do you mean? Does it not apply to your source tree? Oh