On 21.10.2015 18:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Looking around a bit, I found [0]. Apparently someone had the same
issue, though discussion broke off, because the reporter wasn't able
to provide the build log, so here it is for gcc-cross-boot0 (last 200
lines). Maybe we can just lift off where the pr
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Looking at (guix build syscalls) though, I see an ABI mismatch between
> our definition and the actual ‘syscall’ C function, and between our
> ‘clone’ definition and the actual C function.
Good catch! However, please see below.
> This leads to the attach
