On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:21:11PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> OK. Then we effectively need to proceed as you suggest: Build
> python-minimal (which does not depend on Tk), build Tk, and then build
> python.
And maybe this python-minimal could be smaller than the current python,
in the sense
Federico Beffa skribis:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
>> On 07/05/2015 12:16 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> I’m asking because it might be that we could keep the default Python
>>> without Tk, and only use the Tk-enabled Python for the few packages that
>>> need it, if
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> On 07/05/2015 12:16 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I’m asking because it might be that we could keep the default Python
>> without Tk, and only use the Tk-enabled Python for the few packages that
>> need it, if it’s rare enough.
>
> No, we do
