bug#20591: GRUB background image doesn't show up after initial install

On 2015-05-24 12:37, l...@gnu.org wrote: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: Daniel Pimentel writes: After install GuixSD 0.8.2, the Grub image (the GuixSd wallpaper, it's amazing) not appear. I need to update system (guix pull; guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm) (See

bug#19757: [PATCH] gc: ignore trailing slash or subdirectories for `guix gc -d'

>From 7385c2ddd4ca50cb80afcd315287eaadff4d8421 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cyrill Schenkel Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 13:46:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gc: ignore trailing slash or subdirectories for `guix gc -d' Fixes . * guix/scripts/gc.scm (guix-gc): Convert paths to d

bug#20597: ‘unlinkat’ bug in Linux 4.0.2 leads to tar test failure

Pádraig Brady wrote: Yes I agree, either behavior is possible In that case let's change the test case to not run afoul of this implementtion-defined behavior. I don't think we need to change tar, as it's a contrived test case that users are not likely to run into.

bug#20646: List of groups/users should be validated

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Users/groups should be statically validated when the configuration is > instantiated to avoid this kind of issues. Done in 0c09a30. Ludo’.

bug#20646: List of groups/users should be validated

Dave Thompson reported that an ‘operating-system’ declaration where a user is declared with a ‘group’ that doesn’t exist leads to a failure at boot-time (‘useradd’ fails.) This is in GuixSD 0.8.2. Users/groups should be statically validated when the configuration is instantiated to avoid this kin

bug#20591: GRUB background image doesn't show up after initial install

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Daniel Pimentel writes: > > After install GuixSD 0.8.2, the Grub image (the GuixSd wallpaper, it's > amazing) not appear. I need to update system (guix pull; guix system > reconfigure /etc/config.scm) > > (See

bug#20597: ‘unlinkat’ bug in Linux 4.0.2 leads to tar test failure

On 24/05/15 14:53, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Pádraig Brady skribis: > >> On 24/05/15 12:33, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > [...] > >>> unlinkat(4, "foo_file", 0) = 0 >>> unlinkat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", AT_REMOVEDIR) = 0 >>> unlinkat(5, "bar_file", 0) = 0 >>> unlinkat(4, "../bar",

bug#20597: ‘unlinkat’ bug in Linux 4.0.2 leads to tar test failure

On 24/05/15 12:33, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > (Please keep 20...@debbugs.gnu.org Cc'd.) > (Gnulib: please scroll further down for the ‘unlinkat’ issue.) > > Andy Patterson skribis: > >>> I suppose this is Guix 0.8.2 on top of another distribution, right? Did >>> you install from source or from th

bug#20597: ‘unlinkat’ bug in Linux 4.0.2 leads to tar test failure

Pádraig Brady skribis: > On 24/05/15 12:33, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >> unlinkat(4, "foo_file", 0) = 0 >> unlinkat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", AT_REMOVEDIR) = 0 >> unlinkat(5, "bar_file", 0) = 0 >> unlinkat(4, "../bar", AT_REMOVEDIR) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or >> direc

bug#20597: ‘unlinkat’ bug in Linux 4.0.2 leads to tar test failure

(Please keep 20...@debbugs.gnu.org Cc'd.) (Gnulib: please scroll further down for the ‘unlinkat’ issue.) Andy Patterson skribis: > > I suppose this is Guix 0.8.2 on top of another distribution, right? Did > > you install from source or from the binary tarball? Did you enable > > substitutes (i