Sorry, for some reason I didn't get any e-mail and noticed only
closing the bug. I'll subscribe to bug-guix ML to prevent it.
That’s expected, yes. What makes you think it’s a problem?
First, it was conflicting experience with what you were saying on IRC.
User experience was a bit confusing
tag 20137 notabug
thanks
I think the initial “bug” report can be closed. Feel free to open
another bug or wishlist item if you think something must be done in this
area.
Thanks to both of you!
Ludo’.
This is fixed by commit 4d58122.
The problem was that for clients running as ‘root’, the
“substitute-urls” value that the client passes overrides that of the
daemon. And the client’s default value was the empty list, which
‘substitute-binary’ currently rejects.
Thank you!
Ludo’.
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> substitute-binary: In guix/scripts/substitute-binary.scm:
> substitute-binary: 634: 0 [#]
> substitute-binary:
> substitute-binary: guix/scripts/substitute-binary.scm:634:2: In procedure
> #:
> substitute-binary: guix/scripts/substitute-binary.scm:634:2: Throw to key
