'guix package --upgrade' is now the same as "guix package --upgrade=''".
---
doc/guix.texi|7 ---
guix/scripts/package.scm |6 +++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index c91bc20..d69b7d0 100644
--- a/doc/guix.te
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> I think we should plan for 0.2 within a month or so. Here are the
> important features I’d like to see in:
>
> • ‘guix pull’ (see TODO; I’ve started working on that);
>
> • a simple “binary substituter”, which would allow pre-built binaries
> to b
Starting from eba783b, the substituter maintains a local cache (by
default under /nix/var/nix/substitute-binary/cache) of lookups of
binaries.
So if you look for a given /nix/store file name several times in a row,
only the first time does it actually connect to hydra.gnu.org to check
if it’s ther
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> 'guix package --upgrade' is now the same as "guix package --upgrade=''".
[...]
> -(option '(#\u "upgrade") #t #f
> +(option '(#\u "upgrade") #f #f
Should be #f #t (the first one is ‘required?’, the second one is
‘optional?’, see SRFI-37.)
> @@ -602,7
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm: bump to version 2.7.4, remove references to
> python-fix-dbm.patch.
> * Makefile.am: remove references to python-fix-dbm.patch
> * gnu/packages/patches/python-fix-dbm.patch: remove it.
> ---
> On 04/07/2013 04:11 PM, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
>> Th
'guix package --upgrade' is now the same as "guix package --upgrade=''".
---
Hi!
On #guix, we discussed the idea that "--upgrade" should not always require an
argument. When upgrading the whole system, "package --upgrade" feels natural,
maybe even more than "package --upgrade=''".
Here is a patch
* gnu/packages/python.scm: bump to version 2.7.4, remove references to
python-fix-dbm.patch.
* Makefile.am: remove references to python-fix-dbm.patch
* gnu/packages/patches/python-fix-dbm.patch: remove it.
---
On 04/07/2013 04:11 PM, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> This has been fixed upstream, and will be
