> As I wrote, the “bash” input above should be a *directory* containing
> exactly a sub-directory called ‘bin’, itself containing a static
> executable called ‘bash’.
I also copied 'bash' to 'sh'. Because the build had failed without it.
After several hours, it failed again:
[...]
../../gcc-4.
> I like it.
Thanks.
> What about Junction? http://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/junction
I tried it and I think that the current version is better. Here's why I
don't want to use Junction (in this particular case):
1. It's too thin; the logo just falls apart. I can't use a different
> Isn’t there by any chance a /bin/sh behind this?
> You can check by running that in ‘strace -f’, from the failed build tree.
I haven't found anything strange in the output. Could you help me to
investigate?
I've attached the recipe; it's possible that some phases aren't needed.
;;; GNU Guix
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> From 31d58fb07a91fe7a37b55517647b222ec146fcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nikita Karetnikov
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:11:29 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog.
>
> * gnu/packages/gprolog.scm: New file.
> * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
Looks good to
What about this one?
From 31d58fb07a91fe7a37b55517647b222ec146fcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Karetnikov
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:11:29 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog.
* gnu/packages/gprolog.scm: New file.
* Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
---
Makefile.am |
Hello!
I’ve changed ‘--search’ to return matching packages in recutils format.
This is more useful than what we had before, and allows for things like:
$ guix-package -s malloc | recsel -p name,version
name: glibc
version: 2.17
name: libgc
version: 7.2alpha6
Comments welcome
