Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> From 3026baf2a7c37721217567cade9f15d1336d6d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nikita Karetnikov
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:06:18 +
> Subject: [PATCH] distro: Rename 'gettext' to 'guix:gettext'.
>
> * distro/packages/nano.scm (symbol-prefix-proc),
> distro/pac
Hi,
"Jason Self" skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès said:
>> Yes, I’ve been wondering too. The thing is, while most are purely
>> declarative like this, some, like those in base.scm, are trickier
>> and definitely copyrightable. In base.scm, the composition of
>> packages in the bootstrap phase may
From 3026baf2a7c37721217567cade9f15d1336d6d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Karetnikov
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:06:18 +
Subject: [PATCH] distro: Rename 'gettext' to 'guix:gettext'.
* distro/packages/nano.scm (symbol-prefix-proc),
distro/packages/wget.scm (symbol-prefix-proc): New
Ludovic Courtès said:
> Yes, I’ve been wondering too. The thing is, while most are purely
> declarative like this, some, like those in base.scm, are trickier
> and definitely copyrightable. In base.scm, the composition of
> packages in the bootstrap phase may also be copyrightable in itself.
I s
Hi,
So, what's the policy on copyright statements?
I'm not a lawyer that's why I think that it's better to be safe than
sorry (i.e. to use a copyright statement).
Nikita
