w behavior. Is it expected? How do I run it?
In the mean time, here is the WIP version of the patch.
Best regards,
divoplade
Le vendredi 23 octobre 2020 à 21:36 +0200, zimoun a écrit :
> salut,
>
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 01:29, divoplade wrote:
>
> > 1. Lobby guile to prov
I also added a keyword argument to the output functions so that they
can create the directory of the file if needed. What do you think?
From 0e6c74700d2eeb2142ff17ecdb0973806cf79b68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: divoplade
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 00:35:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Use the
do about it. I'm sorry I messed a few things up with the mailing lists
(I should have listened to them, "don't cross the streams"). Could you
elaborate?
Best regards,
divoplade
scm, but this
function is not posix, and posix.scm does not seem to export functions.
By default I will put it in ports.scm, because it is useful for open-
output-directory.
Also, I still cannot run the ports tests! How do I do it? Also test-
out-of-memory fails, but it also fails on master.
b68b66de499 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: divoplade
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 00:35:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Use the recursive mkdir function in file output
procedures
2020-10-25 divoplade
* module/ice-9/ports.scm (open-output-file): add a mkdir keyword
to try to recursively create the dir
eck", I get 1 of 39 tests failed,
the test-out-of-memory test. It does not even try to run the ports
test.
So until I can check it, my work can only be understood as "work in
progress".
Best regards,
divoplade
From ce1eb42ab2db13235e2de71d10529daacdf9df87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200
, not ports.test anymore)
I found it: I just needed to run the ./check-guile script. Now, both
recusive mkdir tests in posix.test run smoothly.
Best regards,
divoplade
From 3c43cd66b8d0d1ada76b19f0b073b7fee0c107c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: divoplade
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 00:35:01 +02
