It looks like you're right, and strangely enough there's a comment in
sort.c right above the definition of sorted? that has the correct
documentation.
I hope other people will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the
ideal thing for you to do now is submit a patch created with git
format-patch.
Hello,
>> I think the reader should only return valid Scheme objects that have a
>> read syntax (info "(r5rs) Lexical Structure"), and records are not among
>> them.
>
> I agree, FWIW.
This seems like circular logic to me - extending the reader should
mean that new types can have read syntax. The
send data between your different Guile
instances in a way that is easy to manually inspect. You need a reader
and a serializer for your C things.
Noah
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Noah Lavine wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>> I think the reader should only return valid Scheme objects that
Well, I wanted to reply to you by seeing how sorted? was used. But
looking at the Guile source code, it appears that there are no uses of
sorted? at all! However, I think it needs to stay like it is, because
other code may depend on it.
Noah
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Marijn wrote:
> -
Hello,
This looks correct to me. It would be ideal if you could make the
patch with "git format-patch". That will let you write the log entry
for the change.
If you plan to make bigger changes to Guile, you'll need to assign
copyright for your changes to the FSF. Please see
http://www.gnu.org/lic
Hello,
> code---
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,profile (let lp ((i 1)) (if (> i 0) (begin
> (format #f "0x~2'0x, 0x~2'0x, 0x~2'0x" i i i) (lp (1- i)
> % cumulative self
> time seconds seconds name
> 22.58 0.56 0.23 tilde-dispatch
>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Noah Lavine skribis:
>
>>> code---
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> ,profile (let lp ((i 1)) (if (> i 0) (begin
>>> (format #f
Hello,
I'm not an expert on GC, but I've seen similar issues pop up several
times. Apparently there is at least one (and I suspect several) Guile
tests whose outputs are nondeterministic. If so, could we make those
tests always succeed?
I say this because I imagine it is very confusing for users
No, they are meant to be supported without any special treatment. I don't
know what is happening in your example.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Jozef Chraplewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks that guile returns incorrect results when it works with really
> big numbers.
>
> I've found it during re
Hello,
This is an interesting bug, because the only way to hit it (as far as I can
tell) is to mess up when writing a compiler. However, I did mess up, and I
discover that I can generate a `call' instruction in the trunk VM where the
procedure to call will be 0x0. Then the VM will try to check whe
apply it to stable-2.0? (Or master?)
Noah
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Noah Lavine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is an interesting bug, because the only way to hit it (as far as I
> can tell) is to mess up when writing a compiler. However, I did mess up,
> and I discover that I can
omething like
that? Then if there's some way for me to run my code in debug mode, I can
get the better output without slowing down most things.
Noah
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> Noah Lavine skribis:
>
> > diff --git a/libgui
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Noah Lavine skribis:
>
> > That makes sense. I hit this error in debugging a CPS->GLIL compiler
> (which
> > I hope will become Guile's compiler, but that's another story). However,
> > once the de
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> The VM does full error checking. But there’s a difference between
> checking whether an object has the expected type, and checking whether
> an object is a well-formed ‘SCM’ object (and NULL is not a valid ‘SCM’
> object.)
>
> Guile neve
Hello,
I'm actually testing on the wip-rtl-cps branch, but this error involves
code that I believe is the same on that branch and on the wip-rtl branch.
Try opening a new Guile and doing the following:
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (system vm rtl))
scheme@(guile-user)> (assemble-program '((be
toplevel-ref 2 foo car)
(tail-call 1 2)
(end-program)))
Best,
Noah
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Noah Lavine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm actually testing on the wip-rtl-cps branch, but this error involves
> code that I believe is the same on that branch and on the wip-rtl branch.
e nargs (like reserve-locals) do odd things.
Noah
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Noah Lavine wrote:
> Oh, I forgot to mention one important fact. I *do* get the expected result
> if I eliminate the stuff with boxes. This works fine:
>
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (assemble-progr
robust.
>
> /Stefan
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Noah Lavine
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just a quick update - it seems to be related to the order of the
> > reserve-locals and bind-rest calls. If I reverse those, the problem goes
> > awa
Hello,
Excuse my ignorance, but what is a "QT"? I can tell you're not referring to
the widget toolkit.
Also, I believe Guile uses pthreads on most platforms, so if you're running
Linux on ARM (which is the common case on ARM nowadays, I think), you
should have threads. Unless you want userspace t
rm having
> less registers to save compared to the x86.
> So QT should always be considered if available, but somehow it seems to
> pass into oblivion.
> Cheers
> eactor
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Noah Lavine
> To: eactors
> Cc: 14672 <14...@d
I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me that libguile could be under LGPL,
but guile the executable could be under GPL, and therefore use readline by
default.
As you say, there would have to be an option to turn it off. Maybe
--no-readline?
Noah
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:01 AM, wrote:
>
>
` produces `#f`. (`,describe
make-regexp` and `,describe regexp-exec` returned information, but
it's not useful unless you can find out what a match object is, which
is what lead me to this problem)
Thank you
Noah Lavine
I found the documentation in info - sorry for the confusion. It didn't
occur to me that a regexp would be considered a "Simple Data Type".
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Noah Lavine wrote:
> I can't find documentation for the (ice-9 regex) module in Guile 1.9.10.
>
&
Here are the last lines from the build output:
cat alist.doc arbiters.doc array-handle.doc array-map.doc arrays.doc
async.doc backtrace.doc boolean.doc bitvectors.doc bytevectors.doc
chars.doc control.doc continuations.doc debug.doc deprecated.doc
deprecation.doc discouraged.doc dynl.doc dynwind.d
Yes, that fixed the issue. Thanks.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> /bin/sh: line 1: 82299 Broken pipe cat alist.doc
>>
>> I'm unsure what would cause this, but I'm happy to help track it down if I
&
Jerram wrote:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Thu 20 May 2010 03:36, Noah Lavine writes:
>>
>>> I found the documentation in info - sorry for the confusion. It didn't
>>> occur to me that a regexp would be considered a "Simple Data Type".
>>
Hello all,
Running the following script with 'guile -l '
#!/usr/bin/guile
!#
(define-module (test-module)
#:export should-be-a-list)
Gives this result:
;;; WARNING: compilation of load-test.scm failed:
;;; key wrong-type-arg, throw_args ("append" "Wrong type argument in
position ~A (expectin
Hello all,
I got the following build error after I pulled the latest git version of Guile:
CCLD libguile-2.0.la
Undefined symbols:
"_iconv", referenced from:
_rpl_iconv in libgnu.a(iconv.o)
(maybe you meant: _mem_iconveh, _iconveh_close , _rpl_iconv_open
, _mem_cd_iconveh , _str_i
onv-prefix to switch, and I get the same error. (I started
with 'make distclean' each time.)
Noah
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 15 Dec 2010 07:49, Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> Undefined symbols:
>> "_iconv", referenced from:
>
> Odd. On what platform is this?
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
>
Hello,
I tried building the latest git Guile, and got the following error:
CC libguile_2.0_la-alist.lo
In file included from ../libguile.h:124,
from ../libguile/programs.h:22,
from ../libguile/_scm.h:84,
from alist.c:25:
../libguile/inline.
hat is
configuring Gnulib, since it has no configure script.
Thanks,
Noah
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Noah Lavine wrote:
> Mac OS X 10.6. There's some weirdness because I have two versions of
> libiconv installed - the one that comes with OS X, and one from
> Macports. They als
Report sent.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Fri 17 Dec 2010 18:10, Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> After looking at this a bit more, I think it's an issue with Gnulib,
>> or possibly the configuration system. I'd like to report it to one of
>>
Hello all,
I was looking in the documentation at the string-index and
string-rindex functions, and I realized that it didn't say what they
did if they didn't find a match. This patch fixes that.
Noah
0001-Document-string-index.patch
Description: Binary data
33 matches
Mail list logo
