Thx,
'mgrabmue
--
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pintus.de/mgrabmue/ mgrabmue@#lkcc on EFnet
===File ~/cvs/guile-core/diff===
Index: ANON-CVS
===
RCS file: /cvs/guile/
ts the first `case' statement and allows
only the second one.
If you think this bug report is too picky, please tell me and ignore
this post.
Thx,
'mgrabmue
--
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pintus.de/mgrabmue/ mgrabmue@#lkcc on EFnet
===File ~/cvs
Hello developers,
here is the fix for the error message problem in `string>?' and others
I promised.
Regards,
'Martin
--
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pintus.de/mgrabmue/ mgrabmue@#lkcc on EFnet
===File ~/cvs/guile-core/libguile/
en the argument check in `%readline' fails, reset the current
input port to the standard input file port.
I think the first is preferable.
Thx,
'Martin
--
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pintus.de/mgrabmue/ mgrabmue@#lkcc on EFnet
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:41:31 +0100 (MET)
> From: Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Martin Grabmueller wrote:
>
> > The next problem is that with readline, you don't get source positions
> > in error messages. The reaso
t-port! p)
(if (and (output-port? p)
(not (port-closed? p)))
(set! output-port p)
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "set-readline-output-port!"
"Not an open output port: ~S"
(list p)
rrors. While fixing that, I also cleaned up the other conversion
functions (they are also a bit faster because arguments are never
checked twice now ;-)
Regards,
'Martin
--
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pintus.de/mgrabmue/ mgrabmue@#lkcc on EFnet
===Fil
is generally wanted, and if yes, if I do it The
Right Way, or if the docstrings can be improved.
Regards,
'martin
ChangeLog entry follows.
2001-01-29 Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* struct.c (scm_make_vtable_vtable): Removed unnecessary "" from
ures in `goops.c' do. Maybe someone can give me a hint, and I
can fix the remaining procedures.
(Hopefully, nobody gets hurt by this gigantic patch...)
Regards,
'martin
ChangeLog entry:
****
2001-01-30 Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* numbers.c
Hi all,
this is not really a bug, but I think the attached change should be
made for the sake of consistency.
2001-02-08 Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* macros.c (scm_macro_name, scm_macro_transformer): Use
SCM_SMOB_DATA instead of SCM_CDR.
Regards,
&
-core
to check out guile-core, but that gives
mgrabmue@tortoise (~/x): cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/guile
co guile-core
cvs server: cannot find module `guile-core' - ignored
cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
Am I missing something?
'martin
--
Mar
ed to do a
cvs update -d
Regards,
'martin
--
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pintus.de/mgrabmue/ mgrabmue@#lkcc on EFnet
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
Hello list,
gethost, when called without arguments, behaves like gethostent, just
like getnet, getproto and getserv without arguments should behave like
their *ent counterparts.
gethost returns #f if no further entries are available, but getnet,
getproto and getserv signal errors (at least on my
Hello list,
Guile segfaults when a Unix domain address with a very long pathname is
passed to calls like `connect', `bind' or `sendto'.
Example:
guile> (define s (socket AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM 0))
guile> (connect s AF_UNIX (make-string 10 #\c))
Segmentation fault
The reason is the following c
> From: Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 04:45:15 -0800
>
> I think in the current CVS guile, there's a bug in let*:
Wow, the second report on this within 20 minutes ;-)
> /home/bil/cl/ ../test/bin/guile-config --version
> guile-config - Guile version 1.4.1
> /home
Hello list,
under Solaris building barfs with the following error:
[...snip...]
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -o .libs/guile .libs/guileS.o guile.o
.libs/libguile.so -ldl -lcrypt -lsocket -lnsl -lm -lcrypt -lsocket -lnsl -lm
-R/usr/local/lib
Undefined first refere
Hello list,
just tried a
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-guile-debug --enable-debug-freelist
--enable-debug-malloc
build, but it breaks:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wp,-MD,.deps/gc.pp -c -fPIC -DPIC gc.c -o .libs/gc.lo
gc.c:
Hello list,
guile-tut.texi seems to be missing in CVS:
mgrabmue@tortoise (~/cvs/guile/guile-core): ./autogen.sh
configure.in:323: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling
configure.in:143: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling
configure.i
> From: Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:56:42 +0100 (MET)
>
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Alexander Klimov wrote:
>
> > I run `make install' and then `make check' again -- results better, but
> > there are 6 failures left.
>
> Hmmm. Here, after make install everything wo
> From: Alexander Klimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:25:27 +0200 (IST)
>
> I run `make install' and then `make check' again -- results better, but
> there are 6 failures left.
>
> with GUILE_LOAD_PATH: /export/home/ask/build/guile-core
> FAIL: bit-operations.test: bit-extract
> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 23 Mar 2001 09:07:32 +
>
> > "Neil" == Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Alexander" == Alexander Klimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander> The change which broke guile documentation is that
> Alexander> [...]
Hello list,
according to R5RS, literally entered vectors do not evaluate to
themselves and must always be quoted. Guile does not detect this
error:
guile> #(as)
#(as)
Should this be fixed, and can it be fixed easily?
Regards,
'martin
___
Bug-guil
> From: Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 05 Apr 2001 01:12:28 +0200
>
> Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > according to R5RS, literally entered vectors do not evaluate to
> > themselves and must always be quoted
> From: Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 18:33:48 +0200 (MEST)
>
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Martin Grabmueller wrote:
>
> > > From: Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: 05 Apr 2001 01:12:28 +0200
> > >
> From: Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 15:12:51 +0200 (MEST)
>
> > > Actually, I don't understand the requirement that vectors don't evaluate
> > > to themselves. The fact that it is said explicitly in R5RS is an
> > > indication that there must be a good reason for it
> From: Martin Willemoes Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:22:59 +0200
>
> I get this error while trying to compile guile-1.4:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall
> -Wmissing-prototypes -c net_db.c -fPIC -DPIC -o net_db.lo
> net_db.c:85: conflictin
Hello list,
I assume it is just a small mistake that values.h is not included in
libguile.h, but I ask anyway because maybe the `multiple values C API'
was only experimental. If it is okay, I will add it. (I need it for
the implementation of `char-set-diff+intersection' in SRFI-14).
Regards,
Hello list,
`thunk?' returns #t for procedures which are not thunks. Consider:
guile> (thunk? identity)
#t
guile> (define (f x) x)
guile> (thunk? f)
#t
Looking at the implementation of `thunk?' (procs.c:238), I see:
switch (SCM_TYP7 (obj))
{
case scm_tcs_closures:
Hello list,
CVS Guile does not build here with the latest IPv6 changes:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wp,-MD,.deps/socket.pp -c -fPIC -DPIC socket.c -o .libs/socket.lo
socket.c: In function `scm_fill_sockaddr':
socket.c:505: structure has no me
> From: Gary Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 20 Apr 2001 07:28:23 -
>
> > From: Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:24:34 +0200
> >
> > Hello list,
> >
> > CVS Guile does not build here with the l
Hello list,
a `make dist' results in this:
automake: doc/Makefile.am: `version.texi', included in `guile-tut.texi', also included
in `guile.texi'
make[1]: *** [distdir] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mgrabmue/cvs/guile/guile-core/doc'
make: *** [distdir] Error 1
I don't have a clue
Hello list,
mgrabmue@tortoise (~/cvs/guile/x/guile-1.4.1/libguile):
GUILE_LOAD_PATH=~/cvs/guile/x/guile-1.4.1/ ./guile
ERROR: In procedure set-current-module:
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1: #f
Is this because `set-current-module' and `current-module' are
currently defined twice? (in
Hello list,
could anyone w/ write privs please change the tag in
page_template.html to have an absolute path name? Otherwise, the image
is not found for the subdirectory pages (mail/mail.html etc.)
Thanks,
'martin
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL
Hello list,
I think that `-' and `/' should issue wrong-number-args errors instead
of the following.
guile> (-)
:1:1: In procedure - in expression (-):
:1:1: Wrong type argument in position 1: #
ABORT: (wrong-type-arg)
Type "(backtrace)" to get more information or "(debug)" to enter the de
> From: Hrafnkell Eiriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 10:22:51 +0200
>
> I cant unpack the guile-1.4.tar.gz archive on Windows with the
> GNU/Cygwin tools nor WinZip. I get the following error:
> [he@HRAFNKELL src]$ tar xfz guile-1.4.tar.gz
> tar: guile-1.4/ice-9/and-let*.scm: C
> From: Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 07:27:00 -0700
>
> Two minor things about the block comments: if you include
> a space after the closing !# you get an error (which strikes
> me as overly zealous),
This could easily be changed, but it seems like this is by d
Hello list,
I suppose this is related to the recent module system changes:
mgrabmue@tortoise (~/cvs/guile/guile-core/libguile):
GUILE_LOAD_PATH=/home/mgrabmue/cvs/guile/guile-core ./guile
guile> (use-modules (definitely not installed module))
guile> (use-modules (please signal a file-not-found
Hello list,
I have just tried to build a fresh CVS Guile under Solaris, but got no
luck. After updating and a make clean, autogen.sh gave the following
warnings:
mgrabmue@fiesta (~/cvs/guile/guile-core): ./autogen.sh
configure.in:160: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cro
> From: "Dale P. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:19:41 -0400
>
> BTW: gensym does not return unique symbols:
>
> guile> (gensym)
> g0
> guile> (define g1 'foo)
> guile> (gensym)
> g1
>
> Wasn't this fixed a while back? Or was that gentemp?
Well, it was noticed a while a
> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 16 May 2001 20:33:22 +0100
>
> > "Masao" == Masao Uebayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Masao> This is also from today's source compilation. Making all
> Masao> in doc gmake[1]: Entering directory
> Masao> `/usr/local/src/guile
> From: Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 17 May 2001 00:50:30 +0200
>
> The canonical solution is to have uninterned symbols, i.e. symbols
> that are not in the global hash table.
So this part would be quite easy, wouldn't it? Just create a symbol
without looking at the global table.
> From: Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:10:34 +0200 (MEST)
>
> Maybe I am too blind to see, but: What are the problems with providing
> unique symbols? We have one single hash table in guile, thus it should be
> possible to determine whether a symbol exists or not.
> From: "Clint Nelissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:38:51 -0700
>
> I get the following error when trying to compile Guile 1.4 on a Redhat
> 7.1 box:
>
> net_db.c:85: conflicting types for `inet_aton'
> /usr/include/arpa/inet.h:74: previous declaration of `inet_aton'
> make[
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 22:24:44 +0900
>
> I'm having problem while compiling guile under RH Linux7.0 (gcc-2.95.3) from
> guile-1.4.tar.gz distribution.
>
> PATH=.:/usr/local/jdk1.3/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/op
> t/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/vchola
> From: na li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 01:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Hi, When I tried to compile guile-1.4, I got the following error,
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith
>-Wmissing-prototypes -c -fPIC -DPIC net_db.c -o .libs/net_db
Hello list,
after the latest type renaming, Guile does not build anymore for me:
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl-g
-O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -c environments.c
rm -f .libs/environments.lo
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2
Hello list,
could someone w/ write privs nuke the mentioning of the guile-doc CVS
module from
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs.html
?
Thanks,
'martin
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/b
Hello list,
well, we all know that Guile's uniform vectors & arrays are strange,
but the following is really buggy, isn't it? (taken from unif.c:315)
I suppose adding a break after before each `case' claus is sufficient,
but maybe someone who uses arrays can confirm that?
switch (SCM_TYP7
Hello list,
I was just trying out an example from the GRM, node `Trace':
guile> (define (rev ls)
... (if (null? ls)
... '()
... (append (rev (cdr ls)) (cons (car ls) '()
guile> (rev '(a b c d e))
(e d c b a)
guile> (trace rev)
(rev)
guile> (rev '(a b c
> From: Joakim Verona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:21:39 +0200
>
> while compilinng guile snapshot on 20010626, i got an error
> "confilicting definitions" of the function inet_aton
> in net_db.c.
>
> I just commented out the definition and it compiled ok. There was an
> exi
> From: Scott Ostrander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:51:00 -0500
>
> Hello, perhaps you can point me in the correct direction or
> tell me what I'm doing wrong.
I don't know about the errors you describe, but is there a reason you
are trying to build such an old version of Gui
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:11:20 +0200
> From: Joakim Verona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> very odd, i downloaded the snapshot just an hour ago. i prefer snapshots
> due to our agressive firewall that makes tunneling cvs cumbersome. but
> thanks, i will download copies from cvs in the future.
Oh da
Hello folks,
when cleaning up the examples directory, I found that my module
examples do not work anymore. The problem can be reproduced with this
example module:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(define-module (test))
(export foo bar)
(define (foo) 1)
(define (bar) 2)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
When I use this modul
Hello list,
another problem discovered when checking the examples:
guile> (use-modules (ice-9 safe))
guile> (define m (make-safe-module))
guile> (eval '(define x 1) m)
guile> (quit)
Some deprecated features have been used. Set the environment
variable GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED to "detai
Hello folks,
the link to the CVS snapshot on
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ftp-snapshots.html
does not work with by browser. It needs an additional slash at the
end:
ftp://krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/pub/guile/snapshots/
Dunno if my browser (Netscape 4.77) or the FTP server is the
> From: "Dale P. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:15:22 -0400
>
> dsmith@sparky:~$ GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED=detailed guile -c '(use-modules
> (oop goops save))'
> Using `export' to re-export imported bindings is deprecated. Use
> `re-export' instead.
> (You just re-exported `m
> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 13 Jul 2001 16:00:45 +0100
>
> neil@laruns:~/Guile/1.5/guile-core$ export GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED=detailed
> neil@laruns:~/Guile/1.5/guile-core$ guile -q
> guile> (use-modules (ice-9 r5rs))
> Using `export' to re-export imported bindings is deprecated
> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 17 Jul 2001 19:14:26 +0100
>
> > "Dale" == Dale P Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dale> There are probably more of these kind of bugs. Someone
> Dale> ought to go through *all* the modules and make sure there
> Dale> are no d
> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 13 Jul 2001 16:11:05 +0100
>
> With GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED=detailed, the output from `make check'
> includes the lines:
>
> Using `export' to re-export imported bindings is deprecated. Use `re-export'
>instead.
> (You just re-exported `current-tim
> From: David Flagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:46:22 +0800
>
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./..
> -I../libltdl-g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -c net_db.c
> rm -f .libs/net_db.lo
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall
> From: Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 13 Aug 2001 13:23:49 -0700
>
> I've only just started reading about keywords, and am not sure I've
> got this right. But it seems that every place in the documentation
> that says `#:key' should really say `#&key' instead -- the former
> doesn't
> From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:53:09 +0200
>
> The node "Formatted Output" has a typo -- "statr" instead of "start"
> in the following paragraph:
>
> `~&'
> Start a new line, that is, output a newline character if not
> already at t
> From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:22:19 +0200
>
> In Emacs "format" does the following:
>
> %f means print a number in decimal-point notation.
> %g means print a number in exponential notation
> or decimal-point notation, whichever uses fewer characters.
>
> From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:58:51 +0200
>
> Typo in note "SRFI-13 - String Library":
>
> * SRFI-13 Replicate/Rotate::Replacate and rotate portions of strings.
>
> should be
>
> * SRFI-13 Replicate/Rotate::Replicate and rotate portions of strin
> From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:00:46 +0200
>
> Suggestion:
>
>All of the procedures defined in SRFI-13, which are not already
> included in the Guile core library, are implemented in the module `(srfi
> srfi-13)'. The procedures which are both in Guil
> From: "Crowder, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:48:56 -0700
>
> It seems like erroneous code at the top-level of an .scm file fails to yield
> filenames and line-numbers for backtrace/error display. For example:
>
> echo error here > test.scm
> guile --debug -l test.scm
> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:53:05 -0700
>
>From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:10:45 +0200
>
>I just wanted some details on "display" but it was not in the R5RS
>Index. The node "Writing" has info on "ne
> From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 12:09:12 -0500
>
> I got a problem instaling guile all versions.
> It Error 1 somwhere in inet-aton
>
> I use Red Hat 7.1 Linux .Any hint will be helpful.
Please see the relevant entry in the Guile FAQ at:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gu
Hello folks,
these are the results on compiling a recent CVS Guile:
Making all in libguile
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/m/mgrabmue/cvs/guile/guile-core/libguile'
./guile-snarf -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes numbers.c > numbers.x \
|| { rm numbe
> From: Fabrice Bauzac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 12:14:11 +0100
>
> The page http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/anon-cvs.html says that
> there's a CVS module called guile/guile-statprof. When I tried to
> checkout,
>
> noon@noon:cvs:513$ cvs -z9 co guile/guile-statprof
> cvs
Hello list,
don't know whether my setup at home is screwed or somthing changed
with Guile's installation procedure. When I try to install te latest
CVS version (both stable and unstable), some of the libraries don't
get installed: libguile and libguilereadline. (Without the latter I
could live,
> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 06 Feb 2002 07:28:51 +
>
> > "thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> thi> i did in source dir: make distclean && cvs update && sh -ex autogen.sh
> thi> and in another dir:
> thi> .../configure -C --enable-maint
> From: Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 04:26:13 -0800
>
> I think define-syntax is stumbling on vector constants:
>
> (use-modules (ice-9 syncase))
>
> (define-syntax IF
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((IF ) (if ))
> ((IF ) (if
>
> (IF (not (vector? #
Neil Jerram schrieb:
> 2008/7/12 Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I would like to create artwork for a free software project, using the
>> cartoon gnu head from the Guile logo [1]. Please can you clarify the
>> license used for this logo, so I know how to license my derivative
>> w
Neil Jerram schrieb:
> 2008/7/12 Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I would like to create artwork for a free software project, using the
>> cartoon gnu head from the Guile logo [1]. Please can you clarify the
>> license used for this logo, so I know how to license my derivative
>> w
75 matches
Mail list logo
