set-object-property!

(assoc, val); else Thanks, Keisuke Nishida

hash-fold

arg) Type "(backtrace)" to get more information. Thanks, Keisuke Nishida

No libguile/validate.h in libguile.h

Hello, In the current CVS repository, libguile/validate.h is not included in libguile/libguile.h. Is this a bug? Thanks, Keisuke Nishida

patch on guile-core/emacs/multistring.el

Hello, A trivial patch. Index: multistring.el === RCS file: /cvs/guile/guile/guile-core/emacs/multistring.el,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 multistring.el --- multistring.el 2000/01/18 11:26:56 1.1 +++ multistring.

a tiny bug in guile-oops/goops-snarf.h

Index: goops-snarf.h === RCS file: /cvs/guile/guile/guile-oops/goops-snarf.h,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 goops-snarf.h --- goops-snarf.h 1999/06/24 03:03:03 1.2 +++ goops-snarf.h 2000/05/04 23:02:02 @@ -16

SCM_ALLOW_INTS in scm_make_weak_*_hash_table

Hello, I don't understand why SCM_ALLOW_INTS is called twice in the functions scm_make_weak_key_hash_table, scm_make_weak_value_hash_table, and scm_make_doubly_weak_hash_table. Isn't this a bug? SCM_DEFINE (scm_make_weak_key_hash_table, "make-weak-key-hash-table", 1, 0, 0, (SCM k),

infinite loop with a generic function

Hello, I'm using the latest Guile and GOOPS from the CVS repository. % guile -q guile> (use-modules (oop goops)) guile> (define-generic string-set!) guile> (string-set! "foo") And Guile enters an infinite loop (^C doesn't work). I guess this is a bug of define-generic: % guile -q

SCM_ALLOW_INTS in hashtab.c

Hello, I wonder whether these orders of SCM_ALLOW/DEFER_INTS is correct or not: static unsigned int scm_ihashx (SCM obj,unsigned int n,struct scm_ihashx_closure * closure) { SCM answer; SCM_ALLOW_INTS; answer = scm_apply (closure->hash, scm_listify (obj, scm_ulong2nu

trivial patch

Index: fports.c === RCS file: /cvs/guile/guile/guile-core/libguile/fports.c,v retrieving revision 1.73 diff -u -r1.73 fports.c --- fports.c2000/04/21 14:16:30 1.73 +++ fports.c2000/05/13 18:15:36 @@ -143,8 +143,7 @@

problem with make-procedure-with-setter

guile> I think this should throw a wrong-number-of-args error, as the following evaluation does: guile> ((procedure f)) standard input:4:1: In expression ((procedure f)): standard input:4:1: Wrong number of arguments to # ABORT: (wrong-number-of-args) Thanks, Keisuke Nishida

Re: Prerelease 1 of Guile 1.4

Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please try out > ftp://ftp.nada.kth.se/SANS/programs/guile/guile-1.3.5pre1.tar.gz On TurboLinux 6.0, gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -c gc.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gc.lo gc.c: In function `alloc_some

Re: Prerelease 1 of Guile 1.4

I wrote: > On TurboLinux 6.0, > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -c >gc.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gc.lo > gc.c: In function `alloc_some_heap': > gc.c:2014: `LONG_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) > gc.c:2014: (Each undeclared identifier is

Bug in goops-snarf.h

Hello, Isn't this a bug of GOOPS? Index: goops-snarf.h === RCS file: /cvs/guile/guile/guile-oops/goops-snarf.h,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 goops-snarf.h --- goops-snarf.h 1999/06/24 03:03:03 1.2 +++ goops-snarf

Named let

Hello, Is this a bug? % guile guile> (let loop ((foo loop)) foo) # R5RS says is bound within .

[Bug-guile] Problem with symbol-pref

Hello, The current Guile's symbol-pref returns #f for pre-defined symbols: % guile -q guile> (symbol-pref 'foo) () guile> (symbol-pref 'quote) #f guile> (symbol-pref 'assq) #f I'm not sure where is the best place to fix this... ___ Bug-g

overwriting `define'

Hello, How should this work? % guile -q guile> (let ((define 1)) (define a 2)) standard input:1:19: In expression (define a 2): standard input:1:19: Wrong type to apply: 1 ABORT: (misc-error) I guess define should be always define.. ___ Bug

tail-call bug with map?

new frame. Is this correct? Thanks, Keisuke Nishida ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

a bug in goops.c

I think this is a bug. --- guile-core/libguile/goops.c.~1.13.~ Thu Jan 11 16:03:18 2001 +++ guile-core/libguile/goops.c Wed Jan 24 19:19:36 2001 @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ SCM_ASSERT (SCM_KEYWORDP (key), key, SCM_ARG1, FUNC_NAME); len = scm_ilength (l); - if (len < 0 || len % 1 == 1) + if (len

Re: a bug in goops.c

At Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:09:05 +0100 (MET), Dirk Herrmann wrote: > > > I think this is a bug. > > Yes, definitely. But, why don't you just apply the patch? I thought you > have write privileges... Right, and I tried, but I couldn't (I should have mentioned that, sorry). It seems my CVS access i

Re: a bug in goops.c

At Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:10:07 -0500, Keisuke Nishida wrote: > > % CVS_RSH=lsh > % cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co guile > subversions.gnu.org: Connection refused > cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) I tried the following and

Problem with __USE_XOPEN

The resent change in posix.c, which defines __USE_XOPEN, causes the following error on my machine (RH7.0 + gcc-2.96 + glibc-2.2) gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wp,-MD,.deps/posix.pp -c posix.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/posix.lo In file included from p

Re: goopscore.scm is not being installed

At Tue, 03 Apr 2001 12:45:56 -0400, Dale P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The file guile-core/oop/goops/goopscore.scm is not being installed. > Here is a patch: Fixed. Thanks! Kei ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.