bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2013-02-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
to pick up the > loose ends. Thanks. > On Thu 02 Feb 2012 18:34, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > . lib/canonicalize-lgpl.c -- does not support Windows absolute file > > names. Will be fixed in gnulib. > > I see you got this into gnulib in N

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2013-02-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org, 10...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:44:35 +0100 > > > . module/ice-9/boot-9.scm -- absolute-path? does not support Windows > > file names with drive letters. Windows > > absolute fi

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2013-02-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org, 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:47:02 +0100 > > Hi Eli, > > On Thu 02 Feb 2012 18:34, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > . module/ice-9/boot-9.scm -- absolute-path? does not support Windows > >

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2013-02-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org, 10...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:39:01 +0100 > > Sorry for the large number of mails. Don't worry about that. > > Avoid compiler warnings on MS-Windows. > > > > * libguile/print.c (display_string_using_iconv): Cast 2nd arg of > >

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2013-02-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org, 10...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:44:39 +0100 > > >>(define (canonical->suffix canon) > >> (cond > >> - ((string-prefix? "/" canon) canon) > >> - ((and (> (string-length canon) 2) > >> - (eqv? (string-ref canon 1)

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2013-02-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org, 10...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:57:18 +0100 > > >> > --- libguile/ports.c~0 2011-10-08 01:49:48.0 +0200 > >> > +++ libguile/ports.c 2012-01-15 15:11:11.856706600 +0200 > >> > @@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ get_iconv_codepoint (SCM por

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2013-02-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org, 10474-d...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:25:06 +0100 > > So with these last commits, hopefully native MinGW builds are supported. > Would you mind testing again? Thanks, will do when I have time.

bug#14361: Building guile 2.0.9 under mingw + msys

2013-05-07 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org, 10474-d...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:25:06 +0100 > > So with these last commits, hopefully native MinGW builds are supported. > Would you mind testing again? Please send a new mail to > bug-guile@gnu.org to track any new failures. Thanks

bug#14361: Building guile 2.0.9 under mingw + msys

2016-06-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: 14361-d...@debbugs.gnu.org, l...@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:19:24 +0200 > > Hi Eli :) > > Thank you for your ongoing work on MinGW and Guile, it's really > appreciated. I just wanted to say that explicitly here, even though I'm > closing this bug, as I underst

bug#14361: Building guile 2.0.9 under mingw + msys

2016-06-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: 14...@debbugs.gnu.org, l...@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:06:05 +0200 > > Let's give it a go! I understand that you do not want to work with > gnulib. That's a negative from a Guile POV -- but it's not a > deal-breaker. I have nothing against Gnulib, but in this

bug#14361: Building guile 2.0.9 under mingw + msys

2016-06-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: 14...@debbugs.gnu.org, l...@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:52:37 +0200 > > On Tue 21 Jun 2016 17:42, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Andy Wingo > >> Cc: 14...@debbugs.gnu.org, l...@gnu.org > >> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-17 Thread Eli Zaretskii
[I removed guile-u...@gnu.org from the CC list; let me know if that is not TRT.] > Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:00:35 +0100 > Cc: guile-u...@gnu.org, 10...@debbugs.gnu.org > > > so I've been trying to build guile 2.0.3 from source with mingw (gcc 4.6.2) > > + msys. > > Thanks for the report! I ha

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-17 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:09:21 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > CC: commander.si...@googlemail.com, 10...@debbugs.gnu.org > > The problem, AFAIK, is entirely different and quite mundane: > canonicalize_file_name simply does not support Windows-style > D:/foo/bar file names

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, wi...@pobox.com, commander.si...@googlemail.com > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:55:31 +0100 > > Hi Eli, > > Eli Zaretskii skribis: > > > The patch to fix canonicalize_file_name is below. > &

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, wi...@pobox.com, commander.si...@googlemail.com > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:55:31 +0100 > > Can you send this one to bug-gnu...@gnu.org? (All the code under lib/ > comes from Gnulib.) For the record, my report to bug-gnulib is h

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:35:04 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, commander.si...@googlemail.com > > > (The rest of your investigation is interesting!) > > Here's some more ;-) As promised, still more issues below. 1. Compilat

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:09:08 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, commander.si...@googlemail.com > > This completes the description of problems I needed to overcome for > building Guile with MinGW+MSYS. Well, it turns out there's more to tell:

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-25 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, commander.si...@googlemail.com > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:12:04 +0100 > > Thanks for doing all the hard work! Thanks for developing Guile. > I’m willing to apply your changes, but could you send them in ‘git > format-patch’ fo

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-01-29 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, commander.si...@googlemail.com > Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:30:50 +0100 > > > I can certainly add ChangeLog entries, but `git format-patch' would be > > harder. I don't have git installed on my development machine (git is > > a b

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-02-01 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, > commander.si...@googlemail.com > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:59:21 +0100 > > I would like to take this task off his back, assuming he's OK with it: > the release process was terribly long, and Ludo deserves a rest ;

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-02-02 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, > commander.si...@googlemail.com > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:39:44 +0100 > > Note that it’s a ‘--disable-networking’ build too, which is easier. That might just explain at least some of the p

bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys

2012-02-02 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andy Wingo > Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), 10...@debbugs.gnu.org, > commander.si...@googlemail.com > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:59:21 +0100 > > I will assume that the canonicalize_file_name issues will get resolved > eventually in gnulib, once your assignment completes. I will go