o (what about adding support for SRFI-145, by the way?) going to
help type inference engine/optimizer or is it too noisy?
>From e1e05e8062e757a0cb802c01f05bb6fa4e1828ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artyom Bologov
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 04:27:01 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] srfi: Add SRFI-253 support
nd macro
expanded during compilation, regardless of whether it was defined before
or after use.
I'm not sure if that's a valid bug, but here you go anyway.
Best of love,
--
Artyom Bologov
https://aartaka.me
Hi David,
> I don't think this is a bug. In my experience, macro definitions must
> precede uses.
This is a sane answer too!
Thanks,
--
Artyom Bologov
https://aartaka.me
