Hello and thanks for this amazing work!
It's clearly not that important, but there are some broken links in the
Guile Reference Manual (e.g, here 6.18.6
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R6RS-Version-References.html)
towards the R6RS library form, pointing there:
https://ww
Rob Browning writes:
> This commit casuses lokke's compilation to fail:
>
> commit fd5cb457fb3a450b4b14eb89c8dbd764ba8df52e
> Date: Mon Apr 5 20:58:03 2021 +0200
>
> Implement cross-module inlining
>
> * module/language/tree-il/optimize.scm (make-optimizer): Pass
> cross-m
Rob Browning writes:
> In 3.0.7, this:
>
> (define-syntax foo
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((_ x) (eq? #nil x
>
> (foo #t)
>
> began crashing like this:
>
> ice-9/psyntax.scm:2795:12: In procedure syntax-violation:
> Syntax error:
> unknown location: unexpected syntax in form ()
Rob Browning writes:
> (hamts/hamt-fold (lambda (k v result) result)
For the record, the full invocation should have been:
(hamts/hamt-fold (lambda (k v result) result)
#t
x)
In any case, it looks like this has been fixed in main (not sure when).
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I’m afraid there’s not much we can do. Unless someone with access to
> an Alpha machine can debug the issue, I’d close it as “wontfix”.
>
> WDYT?
I don't have access to a porterbox in Debian anymore either, and the
port is no longer officially supported:
https://www
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 03 Aug 2015 06:29, Rob Browning writes:
>> I'm not that familiar with srfi-64, but it looks like the problem (if
>> it's not expected) is that test-group doesn't handle the case where it's
>> creating the first group, i.e. no prior test-begin.
> Mark, do you have an
Rob Browning writes:
> This appears to still be the case with at least Debian's 2.0.11+1-10
> package, and setting the handler to something that doesn't perform IO
> has the same effect (i.e. no alarm until you hit return):
>
> (sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (exit 1)))
Just checked -- still tr
