On Sat 11 Mar 2017 19:30, taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich
"Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> Please ignore this, as it's a duplicate of #26058.
On Sat 11 Mar 2017 13:19, taylanbayi...@gmail.com ("Taylan Ulrich
"Bayırlı/Kammer"") writes:
> See the R6RS Libraries document page 10. The differences:
>
> - R6RS supports reading a BOM.
>
> - R6RS mandates an endianness argument to specify the behavior at the
> absence of a BOM.
>
> - R6RS a
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi,
>
> this is a tricky area that is not so amenable to quick patches :) Have
> you looked into what Guile already does for byte-order marks? Can you
> explain how the R6RS specification relates to this?
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/BOM-Handling
On Mon 13 Mar 2017 19:10, taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich
"Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> If I do binary I/O, the following situations are possible:
>
> 1. I'm guaranteed to get any possible bytes that happen to form a valid
>BOM at the start of the stream as-is in the returned bytevector;
