bug#17474: Ping?

2014-08-09 Thread David Kastrup
Three months after its original submission with a working patch series, this issue is not going anywhere for no discernible reason. There has not been any response at all from anybody significantly working on/with the master branch, and it's not like I only tried on the bug tracker. How about at

bug#18223: Duplicate of issue 14792

2014-08-09 Thread David Kastrup
This is actually a duplicate of issue 14792 which has been ignored for over a year by now. Please see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14792#35> for the reason the provided patch (namely discouraging the use of numbers for object properties) is the only one making sense. Here is the

bug#18223: And here's direct proof that the doc is wrong:

2014-08-09 Thread David Kastrup
scheme@(guile-user)> (define wooziness (make-object-property)) scheme@(guile-user)> (set! (wooziness 5) #t) $1 = #t scheme@(guile-user)> (wooziness 5) $2 = #t scheme@(guile-user)> (set! (wooziness 100) #t) $3 = #t scheme@(guile-user)> (wooziness 100) $4 = #f scheme@

bug#18223: Duplicate of issue 14792

2014-08-09 Thread Nala Ginrut
I can't reproduce it, but I'm using the latest mater. Could you provide your version? 2014年8月9日 下午5:47于 "David Kastrup" 写道: > > This is actually a duplicate of issue 14792 which has been ignored for > over a year by now. > > Please see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14792#35> > for

bug#18223: Duplicate of issue 14792

2014-08-09 Thread David Kastrup
Nala Ginrut writes: > I can't reproduce it, but I'm using the latest mater. Could you provide > your version? My version is 2.0.9, but more importantly my architecture is 32bit. Just add enough zeros to move beyond the largest immediate integer, and you'll likely see the same effect. -- David