Re: guile stable-2.0 fails on OSX 10.6.7

2011-04-04 Thread Andy Wingo
On Mon 04 Apr 2011 04:01, Leo writes: > cc1(57938) malloc: *** error for object 0x10357a148: incorrect checksum for > freed object - object was probably modified after being freed. > *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug > vm-engine.c: In function 'vm_regular_engine': > vm-engine.c

Re: guile stable-2.0 fails on OSX 10.6.7

2011-04-04 Thread Leo
On 2011-04-04 15:13 +0800, Andy Wingo wrote: >> cc1(57938) malloc: *** error for object 0x10357a148: incorrect checksum for >> freed object - object was probably modified after being freed. >> *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug >> vm-engine.c: In function 'vm_regular_engine': >> v

Re: shift and reset, plus "while"

2011-04-04 Thread Wolfgang J Moeller
Hi, co-routine linkage problem solved! All it takes, is taking care that each [full] continuation seen by one co-routine are equivalent, so it doesn't matter which one gets saved and restored. No continuation-barrier or dynamic-wind required! While not obvious at first glance, doing so is easy e

Re: guile stable-2.0 fails on OSX 10.6.7

2011-04-04 Thread Andy Wingo
On Mon 04 Apr 2011 10:00, Leo writes: > On 2011-04-04 15:13 +0800, Andy Wingo wrote: >>> cc1(57938) malloc: *** error for object 0x10357a148: incorrect checksum for >>> freed object - object was probably modified after being freed. >>> *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug >>> vm-e

Re: Problem with netcat

2011-04-04 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sun 03 Apr 2011 23:23, John Proctor writes: > However, if I take a scheme source file such as foo.ss with nothing more than > a single express e.g. (+ 1 1) and try : > > $ nc localhost 9000 < foo.ss > > the guile instance dies immediately with no errors or anything. Can anyone reproduce this

Re: guile stable-2.0 fails on OSX 10.6.7

2011-04-04 Thread Leo
On 2011-04-05 04:44 +0800, Andy Wingo wrote: > Sorry, didn't mean to sound hostile there. I don't know anything about > Mac OS 10.6. However if it is still the case that they ship something > called gcc and something called gcc-4.2, you can compile with > ./configure ... CC=gcc-4.2, and you probabl