[bug #25525] Segfault using goops

2010-06-07 Thread Andy Wingo
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #25525 (project guile): This bug is still present in git. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http:

[bug #30062] Submodule retrieval doesn't work

2010-06-07 Thread Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz
URL: Summary: Submodule retrieval doesn't work Project: Guile Submitted by: jao Submitted on: Mon 07 Jun 2010 10:02:22 AM GMT Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal

[bug #30063] Mangled argument names returned by program-arguments-alist

2010-06-07 Thread Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz
URL: Summary: Mangled argument names returned by program-arguments-alist Project: Guile Submitted by: jao Submitted on: Mon 07 Jun 2010 10:06:20 AM GMT Category: None

[bug #30064] program-arguments-alist does not include init forms for kw args

2010-06-07 Thread Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz
URL: Summary: program-arguments-alist does not include init forms for kw args Project: Guile Submitted by: jao Submitted on: Mon 07 Jun 2010 10:11:11 AM GMT Category: None

-0.0 treated as negative?

2010-06-07 Thread Bill Schottstaedt
I just noticed a case where -0.0 is apparently negative: scheme@(guile-user)> (/ 1.0 0.0) +inf.0 scheme@(guile-user)> (/ -1.0 0.0) -inf.0 scheme@(guile-user)> (/ 1.0 -0.0) -inf.0 scheme@(guile-user)> (/ -1.0 -0.0) +inf.0 scheme@(guile-user)> (negative? -0.0) #f And here's a separate oddity: s

[bug #30070] multiple returns from map

2010-06-07 Thread Szavai Gyula
URL: Summary: multiple returns from map Project: Guile Submitted by: szgyg Submitted on: Mon 07 Jun 2010 06:23:03 PM GMT Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal

[bug #30071] unfold isn't tail-recursive

2010-06-07 Thread Szavai Gyula
URL: Summary: unfold isn't tail-recursive Project: Guile Submitted by: szgyg Submitted on: Mon 07 Jun 2010 06:30:34 PM GMT Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal

[bug #30072] rest pattern after ellipsis

2010-06-07 Thread Szavai Gyula
URL: Summary: rest pattern after ellipsis Project: Guile Submitted by: szgyg Submitted on: Mon 07 Jun 2010 06:43:36 PM GMT Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal

[bug #30073] identifier-macros aren't set!-able

2010-06-07 Thread Szavai Gyula
URL: Summary: identifier-macros aren't set!-able Project: Guile Submitted by: szgyg Submitted on: Mon 07 Jun 2010 06:55:44 PM GMT Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal

Re: -0.0 treated as negative?

2010-06-07 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi Bill, On Mon 07 Jun 2010 16:00, "Bill Schottstaedt" writes: > I just noticed a case where -0.0 is apparently negative: > > scheme@(guile-user)> (/ 1.0 -0.0) > -inf.0 > scheme@(guile-user)> (negative? -0.0) > #f Interesting. R5RS seems to be mute on negative zeros. The behavior of negative