2008/8/11 Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> guile> (gcd -2)
> -2
>
> (or any negative single argument).
Is that wrong?
Neil
2008/8/11 Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> guile> (< 1.0+1.0i)
> #t
> guile> (< 2.0 1.0+1.0i)
>
> Backtrace:
> In standard input:
> 2: 0* [< 2.0 {1.0+1.0i}]
>
> standard input:2:1: In procedure < in expression (< 2.0 1.0+1.0i):
> standard input:2:1: Wrong type: 1.0+1.0i
> ABORT: (wrong-ty
gcd is supposed to ignore factors of -1.
"<" is restricted to reals -- a complex arg should be an error.
2008/8/12 Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> gcd is supposed to ignore factors of -1.
According to? (I'm not suggesting that you're wrong. I'd just like
you to be precise about your references.)
> "<" is restricted to reals -- a complex arg should be an error.
Again, is that specified?
2008/8/12 Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/8/12 Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> gcd is supposed to ignore factors of -1.
>
> According to? (I'm not suggesting that you're wrong. I'd just like
> you to be precise about your references.)
R5RS:
6.2.5 Numerical operations
-- libr
