On 25 Jul 2000, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In scm_make_struct, there is the following initialization sequence:
> >
> > SCM_SET_CELL_WORD_1 (handle, data);
> > SCM_SET_CELL_WORD_0 (handle, (scm_bits_t) SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable) +
>scm_tc3_cons_g
Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since I don't know if the removal of scm_struct_init from struct.h
> is considered an API change, I will wait for approval before
> applying that patch.
I appreciate that. In this case, I don't think scm_struct_init is a
meaningful part of the API, an
> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think I've found a bug in assq-remove! and friends. My
>> understanding is that
>>
>> (assq/v/oc-remove! alist key1)
>>
>> should remove all entries fro
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree. Would you like a further patch for this, or will you just
> change the 3 "while"s back to "if"s?
Yep, I'll do the changes myself. The final patch then looks like a
bug fix, where scm_delv_x and scm_delete_x is merely replaced by
scm_delq_x, ri
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I agree. Would you like a further patch for this, or will you just
> > change the 3 "while"s back to "if"s?
>
> Yep, I'll do the changes myself. The final patch then looks like a
> bug fix, where scm_de
