Andy Wingo writes:
> I'm a bit hesitant on this one, as parse-qstring is used in so many
> other places. Perhaps change this one to add parse-opaque-or-qstring or
> something, and call that from parse-etag? Dunno. Are there really many
> sites that do this to their etags?
With the script in q
Hi Ian,
On Fri 09 Sep 2011 11:42, Ian Price writes:
> Writing a quick script the other day I came across two issues when
> guile parses http headers. The first is that 'parse-rfc-822-date' does
> not allow for single digit days, which are allowed in rfc822/1123 [0].
Applied, thanks.
> Secondly
> Patches are supplied for both.
Apparently not. ;-)
--
Ian Price
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
>From 8cde08a514ff1c0d4c09dbfd2d2ae50dc090db46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Price
Date: Fri, 9 S
Hi guilers,
Writing a quick script the other day I came across two issues when
guile parses http headers. The first is that 'parse-rfc-822-date' does
not allow for single digit days, which are allowed in rfc822/1123 [0].
Secondly, a non-guile problem, is that many sites don't quote their
etags.