Patch applied in 0b501477f937718a89a2783409e5b9327a03f800.
Thanks
Sorry about the flood. I have added `(newline)`, but the example
output did not have the literal newlines, so in this patch I have
added both the `(newline)` call and the example output newlines.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 6:01 AM Yuval Langer wrote:
>
> Adding a `(newline)` in this patch.
>
> On T
Adding a `(newline)` in this patch.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 3:23 AM Rob Browning wrote:
>
> Yuval Langer writes:
>
> > diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > index d77bc1c90..1373409f0 100644
> > --- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > +++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
>
Yuval Langer writes:
> diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> index d77bc1c90..1373409f0 100644
> --- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> +++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> @@ -3367,8 +3367,9 @@ The second syntax can be used to create anonymous
> recursive functions:
>
>
From aac75ef98ca6b008fd7d16f42dcb90d22b8ed43c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuval Langer
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 06:37:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix faulty SRFI-31 example.
---
doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules
