Hello,
lloda writes:
>> On 26 Oct 2024, at 19:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> (Cc: lloda.)
>>
>> Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
>>
>>> The specification mandates reals, but the reference implementation
>>> supports complex numbers. So as implementation extension, support th
> On 26 Oct 2024, at 19:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> (Cc: lloda.)
>
> Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
>
>> The specification mandates reals, but the reference implementation
>> supports complex numbers. So as implementation extension, support them
>> as well.
>>
>> * module/s
Like I wrote in a separate message, I think test-approximate should check the
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_distance :
(<= (magnitude (- expected value)) epsilon)
For real numbers, it means the same as the current test. It would also work for
other types for which the user has defin
Hi,
(Cc: lloda.)
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> The specification mandates reals, but the reference implementation
> supports complex numbers. So as implementation extension, support them
> as well.
>
> * module/srfi/srfi-64.scm (within-epsilon): Support complex arguments.
> ---
> Propos
The specification mandates reals, but the reference implementation
supports complex numbers. So as implementation extension, support them
as well.
* module/srfi/srfi-64.scm (within-epsilon): Support complex arguments.
---
Proposal for how to extend test-approximate to handle complex arguments.
Ho
