On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The specification says that test-equal is equivalent to:
>
>> (test-assert [test-name] (equal? expected test-expr))
> Hence the test-assert's requirement to evaluate test-n
Hello,
I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
The specification says that test-equal is equivalent to:
> (test-assert [test-name] (equal? expected test-expr))
Hence the test-assert's requirement to evaluate test-name only once applies.
However the test-name is e