Rob Browning writes:
> (hamts/hamt-fold (lambda (k v result) result)
For the record, the full invocation should have been:
(hamts/hamt-fold (lambda (k v result) result)
#t
x)
In any case, it looks like this has been fixed in main (not sure when).
Hi Rob,
Rob Browning skribis:
> With the current pdfs (https://github.com/ijp/pfds
> 454033f82dac7c0b0ea9e84eed1e8ed316487c78), the code below halts on an
> rnrs record assertion failure with both guile-2.2 and guile-3.0, and I'm
> wondering if I'm doing something wrong, if it might be a guile b
With the current pdfs (https://github.com/ijp/pfds
454033f82dac7c0b0ea9e84eed1e8ed316487c78), the code below halts on an
rnrs record assertion failure with both guile-2.2 and guile-3.0, and I'm
wondering if I'm doing something wrong, if it might be a guile bug, or
if it's more likely an issue wit
