Jamil Egdemir skribis:
>> Maybe we could specify a minimum version number in ‘HACKING’ though? I’m
>> not sure which one.
>
> I was just looking through HACKING and it already mentions that "It's
> probably not essential to have the latest version." I suppose that
> covers it and provides fair n
Ludo',
> We cannot use AC_PROG_LEX because Flex is not a dependency when building
> from a tarball. AC_PROG_LEX would look for flex/lex when running
> ‘configure’, even though it’s not actually needed.
Mm... good point. Ok, scratch that idea.
> Maybe we could specify a minimum version numb
Jamil Egdemir skribis:
> I was using the flex that came with OpenBSD 5.6 which was 2.5.4 so I
> pulled down and installed flex-2.5.39. This got me past these errors
> though I'm not sure if this is associated with differences between the
> OpenBSD brand of flex or just a versioning issue. If it
to...@tuxteam.de writes:
>> flex -t ./c-tokenize.lex > c-tokenize.c || { rm c-tokenize.c; false; }
>> "./c-tokenize.lex", line 1: unrecognized '%' directive
>> "./c-tokenize.lex", line 7: bad character: #
>> "./c-tokenize.lex", line 7: unknown error processing section 1
>> "./c-tokenize.lex", lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:47:51PM -0400, Jamil Egdemir wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I just pulled the latest from the git repo and the build failed on
> OpenBSD 5.6 (output from dmesg is all the way at the bottom if that
> helps):
>
> $ git clone http://gi
Hi Guys,
I just pulled the latest from the git repo and the build failed on
OpenBSD 5.6 (output from dmesg is all the way at the bottom if that
helps):
$ git clone http://git.sv.gnu.org/r/guile.git
$ cd guile
$ autoreconf --install
$ ./configure --prefix=/home/me/usr \
--with-libltdl-prefix=
