Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In that light, and also because a Guile without LARGEFILE64 support is
>> surely better than no Guile at all, I think we should address this
>> problem for the Mac OSes (and also HP-UX, per [1]), by adding a
>>
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In that light, and also because a Guile without LARGEFILE64 support is
> surely better than no Guile at all, I think we should address this
> problem for the Mac OSes (and also HP-UX, per [1]), by adding a
> --disable-64-calls option to ./configure, whose
On 23/01/2008, at 10:09 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
I'm sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant what output do you see when you
run ./config.guess on the command line, on each of the systems where
you've been trying to build Guile?
./config.guess produces:
i386-apple-darwin9.1.0
and on the PowerBook G4:
Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Neil,
> That sounds like an excellent solution.
Great, thanks. I'll just give others a chance to comment before
proceeding.
> Attached is my config.guess file. (Its just the one from the
> distribution with no changes).
I'm sorry, I wasn't cle
Hi Neil,
That sounds like an excellent solution.
Attached is my config.guess file. (Its just the one from the
distribution with no changes).
Roger
config.guess
Description: Binary data
On 23/01/2008, at 9:10 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This m
Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This might help:
>
> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/64bitPorting
>
> Roger
Thank you, that was helpful. Amongst a lot of detail, one of its
messages was that most system call APIs (i.e. the traditional ones
_without_ "64"
This might help:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/64bitPorting
Roger
On 11/01/2008, at 9:53 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
I'm struggling to get my head round Darwin's overall story on 64-bit
APIs. For off_t, it seems to have decided that it's fine to go
unconditionally to
Re: Darwin's overall story on 64-bit APIs.
There maybe something on the Apple Developer website.
I'll see if I can find something that might be useful.
I'll recheck my off_t comments later.
Regards
Roger
On 11/01/2008, at 9:53 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems to be 32 bit?
Well, according to your previous email:
> checking size of off_t... 8
Which means 64 bit.
I'm struggling to get my head round Darwin's overall story on 64-bit
APIs. For off_t, it seems to have decided that it's fine to go
unco
Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Similiar problem with filesys.c
> Compiles by changing in _scm.h
> #define dirent_or_dirent64
> CHOOSE_LARGEFILE(dirent,dirent64)
> to
> #define dirent_or_dirent64 dirent
This follows on from the off_t question. If your off_t is actuall
Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Compilation of guile-1.8.3 fports.c failed as the stat64 package in
> Mac OSX Leopard does not seem to declare off64_t.
> only off_t seems to be declared.
> To get fports.c to compile:
> In _scm.h I changed
> #define off_t_or_off64_t
Similiar problem with filesys.c
Compiles by changing in _scm.h
#define dirent_or_dirent64
CHOOSE_LARGEFILE(dirent,dirent64)
to
#define dirent_or_dirent64 dirent
Now some resulting link problems to sort out!
Regards
Roger
On 09/01/2008, at 2:00 PM, Roger Mc Murtrie
12 matches
Mail list logo
