> "thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
thi>From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thi>Date: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100
thi>No; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new
thi>environment that shares some substructure with the old
t
From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100
No; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new environment
that shares some substructure with the old environment.
ok i see this now.
But, does this test need a different execution environment? It's
> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK. Any thoughts on whether this is worth putting into the stable
>> branch as well? I assume it's Rob's decision...
Marius> If I understand the issue right (which I
> "thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
thi>From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thi>Date: 02 May 2002 13:59:06 +0100
thi>The copy in scm_unmemocopy, which looks as though it might be
thi>intended to fix this problem [...]
thi> was this u
From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 02 May 2002 13:59:06 +0100
- SCM_SETCAR (SCM_CAR (env), scm_cons (n, SCM_CAR (SCM_CAR (env;
The copy in scm_unmemocopy, which looks as though it might be
intended to fix this problem [...]
was this used previously? (i'm trying
