* doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-64 Writing Basic Test Suites): Fix
typo. Add default test runner example. Add test-approximate and
test-error examples. Document valid error types in Guile for test-error.
(SRFI-64 Conditonal Test Suites and Other Advanced Features): Fix typo.
Suggested-by: Arn
Hi,
Finally acting on this, now that it's already been merged by Ludovic
^^'.
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>> diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
>> index 02da3e2f2..4d408d6cb 100644
>> --- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
>> +++ b/d
* lib/malloc/.dirstamp: Delete file.
* .gitignore: Register.
---
.gitignore | 2 +-
lib/malloc/.dirstamp | 0
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
delete mode 100644 lib/malloc/.dirstamp
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 7706a0879..8180beb12 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
>> This is an import of the 'Abstract', 'Rationale', and 'Specification'
>> sections from the upstream specification text, with some manual
>> adjustment.
>>
>> * doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI 64): New subsection.
Hi Juliana,
Juliana Sims skribis:
> * module/srfi/srfi-1.scm (map!): Re-use cons cells of first argument.
Could you add a couple of tests under ‘test-suite/tests/srfi-1.test’?
Apart from that it looks good to me. Thank you!
Ludo’.
Hi,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> The ~V is supposed to print ISO week number, not a week number. This
> commit fixes that.
>
> * module/srfi/srfi-19.scm (date-week-number-iso): New procedure taken
> from the reference implementation.
> (directives)<#\V>: Use it.
> * test-suite/tests/srf
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> Looking at the SRFI-19 specification, the argument is called `day', not
> `date'. Even the accessor is called `date-day'. So adjust the
> documentation to match.
>
> Also adjust the (web http) module, which was using `date' as well.
>
> * doc/ref/srfi-module
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> This is an import of the 'Abstract', 'Rationale', and 'Specification'
> sections from the upstream specification text, with some manual
> adjustment.
>
> * doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI 64): New subsection.
Finally applied with the typographical changes be
Hi Ekaitz,
Apologies for applying the wrong version of the patch series!
I pushed the 3 patches you just sent:
6750f6cc8 * PEG: string-peg: Add HTML5 grammar test.
38ad26497 * PEG: string-peg: Better support for escaping.
c86a48a92 * PEG: string-peg: Fix [^...] interpretation.
I added com
The three previous messages (SORRY) add the changes that were missing in
when v4 was applied instead of v5.
---
test-suite/tests/peg.test | 117 --
1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test-suite/tests/peg.test b/test-suite/tests/peg.test
index d9e3e1b22..d8d047288 100644
--- a/test-suite/tests/peg.test
+++ b/test-suite/tests/peg.test
@@ -86
---
module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm | 26 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm b/module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm
index 745d8e8e7..9891f2ae5 100644
--- a/module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm
+++ b/module/ice-9/peg/strin
---
module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm | 16
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm b/module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm
index 0026f8930..745d8e8e7 100644
--- a/module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm
+++ b/module/ice-9/peg/string-peg.scm
hi!
I didn't realize but you pushed the v4, and I detected a bug in it so I
sent v5.
The bug is in the [^...] implementation.
v5 fixes it and it even simplifies the code.
Please revert 25504ba21 and apply the v5 instead.
14 matches
Mail list logo
