See snippet below.
IMHO the second call to add1 should fail. On guile-2.2.6 it does not error
out.
On guile-2.0 it does throw error (as I think it should).
Is this intentional?
=-=-=
(define (main)
(define (add1 num)
(+ num 1))
(display "testing")
(display (add1 2))
(display (add1 2 3)
Hello schemers,
The following program works in Guile 2.2.6 (and other R6RS
implementations), but raises an exception in Guile 2.9.7. A field called
"name" exists in record type a and record type b, but there is no actual
naming conflict as I understand it.
--8<---cut here-
