Andy Wingo writes:
>> I'm also a bit puzzled why you're apparently planning to rewrite
>> everything I already did on the 'r7rs-wip' branch. The main issue on
>> that branch is that the implementation of *writing* cyclic data turned
>> out to be a mess, but it could be removed or replaced withou
Hi,
I was tinkering with srfi-11 and was wondering whether the following
is correct:
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,expand (let-values (((a b c) (values 1 2 3))
> ((d . e) (values 4 5)))
> (list a b c d e))
> $26 = ((@@ (srfi srfi-11) call-with-values)
Hey!
On Mon 18 Nov 2019 16:10, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> R7RS defines a lexical feature called "datum labels"; see section 2.4 in
>> the report. An example would be:
>>
>>#0=(a b c . #0#)
>>
>> Guile's reader doesn't support this feature and it's not clear if we
>> sh
Hi Andy,
Andy Wingo writes:
> R7RS defines a lexical feature called "datum labels"; see section 2.4 in
> the report. An example would be:
>
>#0=(a b c . #0#)
>
> Guile's reader doesn't support this feature and it's not clear if we
> should, in general.
FYI, I already implemented R7RS datum
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> If you'd be willing to take a quick look at this, I'd be grateful.
> Probably a bug, but I feel uneasy that I might be overlooking something.
>
> scm_port_poll contains the following code:
>
> if (scm_i_string_contains_char (events, 'r'))
> c_events |= POL
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Brielmaier skribis:
> Guix fails to build on Tumbleweed with `make -j4` or a greater thread
> count (see guile_coredump_building_guix.log)
>
> It doesn't fail to build with `make -j3` or less threads and when
> building inside of `guix environment --pure guix`.
>
> I then s
