bug#34457: GNU Guile: Error in docstring of proc reverse-list->string

2019-02-12 Thread tomas
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:34:06PM +0400, Андрей wrote: > Good day! > > The docstring of `reverse-list->string` proc says: > ``` > scheme@(guile-user)> (help reverse-list->string ) > `reverse-list->string' is a procedure in the (guile) module. > > - Scheme Procedure: reverse-list->string chrs >

bug#20339: sxml simple: sxml->xml mishandles namespaces?

2019-02-12 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
to...@tuxteam.de writes: > As John has noted, the namespace mappings (i.e. the prefix -> namespace > URI binding) are kind of lexically scoped (I'd call it subtree scoped, > but structurally it is the same). While parsing is "easy" (assuming > well-formed XML), serializing is not unambiguous. T

bug#34457: GNU Guile: Error in docstring of proc reverse-list->string

2019-02-12 Thread Андрей
Good day! The docstring of `reverse-list->string` proc says: ``` scheme@(guile-user)> (help reverse-list->string ) `reverse-list->string' is a procedure in the (guile) module. - Scheme Procedure: reverse-list->string chrs An efficient implementation of `(compose string->list reverse)':

bug#20339: sxml simple: sxml->xml mishandles namespaces?

2019-02-12 Thread tomas
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:44:02PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hello! > > I just looked at this again and I think I came with something useful. > Here’s some context: [...] > Attached is a patch that does the requested things. The parser > procedures like FINISH-ELEMENT have access to all th