On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> Hi Mark!
> Thanks for all the advices.
>
> Here's the new patch according to your advices.
> Include:
> 1. Added new procedure pointer->procedure-with-errno with
> #:return-errno?
>
> Question: Should we make #:return-errno? true in default? Thi
Hi Mark!
Thanks for all the advices.
Here's the new patch according to your advices.
Include:
1. Added new procedure pointer->procedure-with-errno with
#:return-errno?
Question: Should we make #:return-errno? true in default? This would
make the name *-with-errno more reasonable. At present, it's
One more thing I forgot to mention: These two commits should be combined
into a single commit.
Thanks!
Mark
Hi Nala,
Thanks for working on this :)
Please see below for comments.
Nala Ginrut writes:
> From 88a99af4b5db9096c3cde51c72eb371b6be76754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nala Ginrut
> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:27:59 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add option to pointer->procedure to return errno
Resubmit since errno should be stored after ffi_call.
>From 88a99af4b5db9096c3cde51c72eb371b6be76754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nala Ginrut
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:27:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add option to pointer->procedure to return errno if
necessary
---
libguile/foreign.c | 33
