Re: libguile/socket.c

Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Thanks for confirming this. I'll make the change in CVS. > > Please also make this change in the branch_release-1-8 branch if > appropriate. Yes, I've done that. Neil __

Re: libguile/socket.c

Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for confirming this. I'll make the change in CVS. Please also make this change in the branch_release-1-8 branch if appropriate. (I'll make a note so that I don't forget about it myself in case you can't find time.) -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC

Re: libguile/socket.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I wonder if that's because it's generally concerned about >> uninitialized variables, or because it's noticed the apparent bug in >> scm_c_make_socket_address, which does nothing with its address_siz

Re: libguile/socket.c

Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wonder if that's because it's generally concerned about > uninitialized variables, or because it's noticed the apparent bug in > scm_c_make_socket_address, which does nothing with its address_size > parameter and instead has another size_t variable

Re: libguile/socket.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (hyperdivision) writes: > line 1259 from cvs > libguile/socket.c > > size_t c_address_size needs to be set to 0 > otherwise gcc4 croaks. I wonder if that's because it's generally concerned about uninitialized variables, or because it's noticed the apparent bug in scm_c_make_sock