Re: Bad deprecation warnings in numbers.c

2002-04-13 Thread Rob Browning
Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IMO, people should not use any of these functions at all. We should > try to remove their use from other places within guile as well. The > reason is, that these functions depend on the implementation of the > bignums, which should be considered the s

Trouble building stable branch right now

2002-04-13 Thread Neil Jerram
I'm seeing automake errors, like these, which cause autogen.sh to fail: + automake --add-missing srfi/Makefile.am:38: bad macro name `libguile_srfi_srfi_4_lt_@LIBGUILE_SRFI_SRFI_4_LTHACK@_la_SOURCES' srfi/Makefile.am:39: bad macro name `libguile_srfi_srfi_4_lt_@LIBGUILE_SRFI_SRFI_4_LTHACK@_la_L

Re: Bad deprecation warnings in numbers.c

2002-04-13 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Dirk" == Dirk Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dirk> On 1 Apr 2002, Neil Jerram wrote: >> There is a group of deprecation warnings in (stable) numbers.c that >> say, for example: >> >> scm_c_issue_deprecation_warning ("`scm_mkbig' is deprecated. " >> "Use `scm_