From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 08 Mar 2002 23:53:35 +
I'd say it's a bug, and that it would be better to squash it now than
to support strange expectations through 1.6.x.
it's also a bug in the sense that side-effects on load (except for
`define') are usually conside
> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
>> end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
>> any reason why we shoul
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
> end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
> any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable
> branch?
This change would be too far reachi
Hasn't this one been fixed by the change from AC_LIBLTDL_CONVENIENCE
to AC_LIBLTDL_INSTALLABLE?
Neil
(Both stable and unstable branches have this ChangeLog entry:
2001-11-19 Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* configure.in: switch to AC_LIBLTDL_INSTALLABLE so we'll use the
Is this still a problem? I can't reproduce it with either stable or
unstable.
For me,
- `guile -s bug9.scm' outputs about 15 `a's and `b's, and then stops,
as the main thread has exited
- `guile -l bug9.scm' continues outputting `a's and `b's forever, and
also performs normal REPL interact
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable
branch?
Neil
___
Bug-guile mailing lis
Re bug number 8 `install requires makeinfo'...
I know we've already addressed this partially in Makefile.am, by
copying guile-procedures.texi to guile-procedures.txt if makeinfo is
not available.
However, wouldn't a better fix be to include a prebuilt
guile-procedures.txt in the distribution? I
Examples:
guile> (version)
"1.5.4"
guile> (use-modules (ossau breakpoints))
guile> (use-modules (srfi srfi-19))
guile> (trace-subtree! date-week-number)
Set breakpoint 1: [date-week-number]
#< 808baa0>
guile> (define d (string->date "01 08 2002" "~d ~m ~y"))
guile> (debug-set! frames 33)
(show-fi
Title: 1.
