[±¤°í]¾î´úÆ®ºñµð¿À ÆÄÆ®³Ê¸ðÁý!!ÇÏÀ§2´Ü°è Ä¿¹Ì¼ÇÁö±Þ

2001-10-05 Thread µµÄì¼½½º
Title: ±¹³»¸ôÄ«/È­»óÄ·/porno¼½½º°­ÁÂ/K¾ç ÈÉÃĺ¸±â µî ±¹³»¸ôÄ«/È­»óÄ·/porno¼½½º°­ÁÂ/K¾ç ÈÉÃ帱⠵î [±¹³» ¼ºÀΰ¡ÀÔ·ü1À§]¸¦ ÀÚ¶ûÇÏ´Â ¾î´úÆ® ºñµð¿À¿¡¼­ °¡ÀÔÀü ȸ¿ø´Ô²² Ưº° ¼±¹°À̺¥Æ®¸¦ ¸¶·ÃÇß½À´Ï´Ù. Çѱºµ¥ °¡ÀÔÀ¸·Î avkorea  ¿Í avjapan  µÎ°÷¸ðµÎ °¨»óÇϽǼö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. 1°³¿ù  (18,000¿ø) 2°³¿ù  (

¡á ´©±¸³ª °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù!

2001-10-05 Thread Rin
¸ÕÀú, ½ºÆÔ°ü·Ã ¸ÞÀÏÀ̶ó°í ¿ÀÇØÇÏ½Ç °Í °°¾Æ ±¦ÂúÀº »çÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾Ë·Áµå¸³´Ï´Ù.¡á http://ezguide.wo.to ¡á¹ÂÁ÷°ü·ÃÁ¤º¸, ÀÎÅÍ³Ý Á¤º¸ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ´Â 'EZ-GUIDE'ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.À¥ ¼­ÇÎ ÇϽø鼭 ¶ç¾î³õÀ¸½Ã¸é ±¦Âú°Ú´Ù ½Í¾î¼­ ¾Ë·Áµå¸³´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏ¿¡°Ô À¯¿ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¿´À¸¸é ÇÏ´Â ¸¶À½ °£ÀýÇÕ´Ï´Ù.===

Re: Tcl War link

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 05 Oct 2001 19:32:23 +0100 Opinions? i'm in favor of dropping the link -- anyone who wants to maintain that kind of thing should consider putting on the guile wiki: http://www.glug.org/docbits/index.html#guile-wiki thi

Re: Threads

2001-10-05 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Gary" == Gary Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 01:02:30 -0700 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> From: Gary Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 29 Sep 2001 >> 21:13:35 - >> >> It seems to work OK in Guile 1.3.4.

Re: Tcl War link

2001-10-05 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Golubev" == Golubev I N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Golubev> in Golubev> `guile-tut.texi' are non-existent currently. Well we can probably find some replacement URLs, but I think the wider question is whether we still want to preserve

Re: guile.info: Procedures for On the Fly Evaluation

2001-10-05 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Alex" == Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alex> Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> i believe this bug is actually a misunderstanding. [...] guile> read-and-eval! >> # guile> (version) >> "1.5.2" guile> >> Alex> Hm. Maybe when I

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
From: "Golubev I. N." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:47:29 (GMT) Yes, if `and-let-star-compat.scm' never ever will be generated in build time (so that right version of it will appear in build dir). from looking at the makefiles, i could not infer when (if ever) and-let

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N.
Yes, if `and-let-star-compat.scm' never ever will be generated in build time (so that right version of it will appear in build dir). ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
is the following change sufficient? - -$(INSTALL_DATA) and-let-star-compat.scm \ + -$(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/and-let-star-compat.scm \ thi ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N.
Installation program does not find `and-let-star-compat.scm' in current (= build) directory and `and-let*.scm' does not get installed. ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
From: "Golubev I. N." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:25:07 (GMT) To get 'and-let*.scm' installed correctly when source directory is not the same as build one, I copied commands from `Makefile.in' in `Makefile.am'. what behavior do you see w/o this patch? thi _

Re: guile.info: Writing

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
From: Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 17:20:14 +0200 (MEST) I'm not sure, but I think Alex was talking about the `R5RS Index' node in the GRM. of course! sorry for the brain fade... i've added a "display" entry to the node "Writing" (both branches). th

Tcl War link

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N.
in `guile-tut.texi' are non-existent currently. ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: guile.info: Writing

2001-10-05 Thread Martin Grabmueller
> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:53:05 -0700 > >From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:10:45 +0200 > >I just wanted some details on "display" but it was not in the R5RS >Index. The node "Writing" has info on "ne

Re: Top-Level Debug/Backtrace Bug

2001-10-05 Thread Martin Grabmueller
> From: "Crowder, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:48:56 -0700 > > It seems like erroneous code at the top-level of an .scm file fails to yield > filenames and line-numbers for backtrace/error display. For example: > > echo error here > test.scm > guile --debug -l test.scm

Re: -c 0

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N.
> do you still see this w/ guile-1.5.4? No. (I did not download the tarball, used branch_release-1-6 from cvs). ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: -c 0

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N.
> do you still see this w/ guile-1.5.4? No. (I did not download the tarball, used branch_release-1-6 from cvs). ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile