[bug #62830] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

2022-07-28 Thread TANAKA Takuji
: None ___ Follow-up Comments: --- Date: Thu 28 Jul 2022 12:56:27 PM UTC By: TANAKA Takuji I wrote a set of patches in order to support CJK fonts in PostScript outputs. Attached you will find the patches. - It enables to support C

[bug #62830] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

2022-07-28 Thread TANAKA Takuji
Additional Item Attachment, bug #62830 (project groff): File name: cjk-ps.patch Size:32 KB ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #62830] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

2022-09-03 Thread TANAKA Takuji
Additional Item Attachment, bug #62830 (project groff): File name: cjk-ps-html_20220902.patch Size:85 KB ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #62830] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

2022-09-03 Thread TANAKA Takuji
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #62830 (project groff): I have updated my patch (cjk-ps-html_20220902.patch). I followed up the latest repository. I added CJK support for html, dvi, tty(utf8). I added CJK font settings for html, dvi, tty(utf8). In post-grohtml, I added option "-U" to enable output in

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

2022-11-22 Thread TANAKA Takuji
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #62830 (project groff): I updated my patch. - sync with master of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git I hope the maintainers to consider accepting my request. Thanks, Takuji TANAKA (file #53990) ___ Add

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

2023-04-15 Thread TANAKA Takuji
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #62830 (project groff): I updated my patch. 1. Font description files There is a precedent of font description file for Japanese support of groff by Japanese developers (Fumitoshi UKAI et al.) https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groff/1.18.1.1-12 They defined

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

2023-12-29 Thread TANAKA Takuji
Follow-up Comment #10, bug#62830 (group groff): I updated my patch to adjust to the latest upstream source code. > While Mincho and Gothic loosely compare to serif and sans serif styles > I think the font family classification terminology should be language-agnostic Thank Oliver for kind comment