[bug #66888] update stale references to troffcvt in groff documentation

Update of bug #66888 (group groff): Status:None => Confirmed Summary: Update stale references to troffcvt in groff documentation => update stale references to troffcvt in groff documentation ___

[bug #65099] 1.24.0 release goals

Update of bug #65099 (group groff): Depends on: => bugs #66888 ___ Follow-up Comment #11: Adding dep on bug #66888, a documentary item. ___ Re

[bug #63332] [PATCH] recent fallbacks.tmac change degrades ASCII output

Follow-up Comment #23, bug #63332 (group groff): [comment #20 comment #20:] > Do either of these sound reasonable to you? Do you have a preference? At the moment, this works, and it'd be a shame if it stopped (which, if I understand correctly, both your proposals would do). $ cat sad .char \[ex

[bug #66903] Please recommend a date format in groff_man(7)

URL: Summary: Please recommend a date format in groff_man(7) Group: GNU roff Submitter: alx Submitted: Wed 12 Mar 2025 04:38:33 PM UTC Category: Macro package man

[bug #66903] Please recommend a date format in groff_man(7)

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #66903 (group groff): For context, * AT&T Version 1 to AT&T Version 6 UNIX used mm/dd/yy * AT&T Version 7 UNIX used mm/dd/yy in nroff output and Month dd, year in troff output * 2BSD used mm/dd/ * 3BSD to 4.1BSD were inconsistent * 4.2BSD used dd Month (no comma)

[bug #63332] [PATCH] recent fallbacks.tmac change degrades ASCII output

Follow-up Comment #22, bug #63332 (group groff): [comment #20 comment #20:] > we don't always want that--definitely not when simply trying to > look up character info for debugging purposes (a new feature), > and not when trying to _delete_ a character--an old feature > which I wonder now if it ev

[bug #66903] [man,mdoc] recommend ISO 8601 date format

Update of bug #66903 (group groff): Category: Macro package man => Macro package - others/general Status:None => Confirmed Summary: Please recommend a date format in groff_man(7) => [man,mdoc] recommend ISO 8601 date form

[bug #65099] 1.24.0 release goals

Follow-up Comment #9, bug #65099 (group groff): Added dep on #66903, a documentation change. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savannah ht

[bug #65099] 1.24.0 release goals

Update of bug #65099 (group groff): Depends on: => bugs #66903 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Sav

[bug #65099] 1.24.0 release goals

Follow-up Comment #10, bug #65099 (group groff): [comment #9 comment #9:] > Added dep on #66903, a documentation change. Excuse me, Savannah, bug #66903 for your pattern-matching pleasure. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #66876] [devps] error in font/devps/generate/Makefile

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #66876 (group groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > The package build is ghostscript-fonts-grops. > See: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/M17N:fonts/ghostscript-fonts-grops. > If you look in the file: ghostscript-fonts-grops.spec > in the %build section, the error h

[bug #66876] [devps] error in font/devps/generate/Makefile

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #66876 (group groff): Sorry, I was unclear about something. [comment #3 comment #3:] > Right now I would not expect upgrades/downgrades involving font description > file format feature changes to work unless the font-providing package > declared appropriately strict depe

[bug #66903] Please recommend a date format in groff_man(7)

Update of bug #66903 (group groff): Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savann