[bug #66143] build doesn't find Homebrew uchardet on macOS 14.6.1

Follow-up Comment #30, bug #66143 (group groff): Hi Branden, hi Dave! Thanks for bringing this issue to a close. I was wondering what I could contribute any further to not let all these words go to waste. :) I agree a notice in the repo probably is the best resolution. Cheers Sven ___

[bug #66332] [mom] image caption not centered when set to render after label

Follow-up Comment #13, bug #66332 (group groff): [comment #3 comment #3:] > Mom places labels below images and captions above unless CAPTION_AFTER_LABEL IMG (or ALL), in which case the label and the caption are joined and set below the image. If you have CAPTION_AFTER_LABEL but don't provide a la

[bug #66174] [mdoc] `Bl` macro's `-width` option poorly documented

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #66174 (group groff): At 2024-10-15T04:20:15-0400, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: > Follow-up Comment #5, bug #66174 (group groff): > > The report is valid as it shows a regression. I don't agree. The input document uses incorrect syntax for what it's trying to do. The

[bug #66333] [gropdf] PerlMagick sabotages the test suite

Update of bug #66333 (group groff): Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => deri Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:

[bug #66333] [gropdf] PerlMagick sabotages the test suite

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #66333 (group groff): It is documented here:- https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/332928/ It appears the vulnerability was addressed in ghostscript 9.24 so if you have a later version it is no longer necessary to employ the proscribed workaround. However, debian don't seem

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Update of bug #66323 (group groff): Category: Macro package mom => Driver gropdf ___ Follow-up Comment #23: Updating "Category" to _gropdf_. ___ Rep

[bug #66332] [mom] image caption not centered when set to render after label

Update of bug #66332 (group groff): Status:None => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.24.0 Summary: [mom]

[bug #66333] [gropdf] PerlMagick sabotages the test suite

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #66333 (group groff): Filed as [https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1085149 Debian #1085149]. (, , , ) ___ Reply to this item at: _

[bug #66335] [PATCH] doc/pic.ms: include linethick variable in pic.ms reference section #21

URL: Summary: [PATCH] doc/pic.ms: include linethick variable in pic.ms reference section #21 Group: GNU roff Submitter: None Submitted: mar. 15 oct. 2024 10:12:52 Category: Pr

[bug #66174] [mdoc] `Bl` macro's `-width` option poorly documented

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #66174 (group groff): The report is valid as it shows a regression. Installed "nroff" (version 1.23.0) and "mandoc" render the man page fine. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #30, bug #66323 (group groff): [comment #29 comment #29:] > nothing indicates you can mailpost here Every email I get from the savannah bug tracker contains this footer: To reply to this notification, you have two options: * In the Web UI at

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #31, bug #66323 (group groff): Oh, since you're not posting using a savannah account, savannah might not include that footer in mail to you, since you can't meet the requirements for email replies. ___ Reply to this item

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #29, bug #66323 (group groff): web; nothing indicates you can mailpost here (indeed, contraindicates this to me) ___ Reply to this item at: _

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #26, bug #66323 (group groff): Savannah failed to attach newpdf94.pdf. Let's try again ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #25, bug #66323 (group groff): Thanks. By comparing what your dump does and what my attempts didn't, I managed to get an equivalent setup locally for -Tpdf as I have for -Tps (not that it didn't fight me every step of the way). As a bonus, ps2pdf(?) no longer spends minutes unpic

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #27, bug #66323 (group groff): Not this time either. Ah well, it's all at https://lfs.nabijaczleweli.xyz/0025-groff-Tpdf-fonts/ ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #28, bug #66323 (group groff): At 2024-10-15T19:36:37-0400, anonymous wrote: > Follow-up Comment #26, bug #66323 (group groff): > > Savannah failed to attach newpdf94.pdf. Let's try again Did you try to attach via the email or the Web interface? If the former, https://savannah

[bug #66323] [gropdf] rendering differences between PostScript and PDF output?

Follow-up Comment #24, bug #66323 (group groff): Hi наб, I have created devps and devpdf fonts for the gsfonts you want to use, similar to the gsfonts tar on your website, but including all 35 fonts, and for devpdf. gsfonts-all.tgz contains two subdirectories, devpdf and devps, so, for testing, I