Follow-up Comment #3, bug #44714 (group groff):
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> I don't understand why '.do tm' is going to the next input line
> to collect arguments. 'tm' is not documented in CSTR #54 as
> behaving this way.
It's not the behavior of .tm that's at issue, but of .do.
This is the bug
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #62826 (group groff):
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> .\" Due to a bug in GNU troff it necessary to have a no-op line between
> .\" '.do' and '\*'.
This is bug #44714.
> +. do ie \\n[.cp] \{\
> +.do als TH reload-man
> +.hw\"DO NOT REMOVE the line, see an earlier co
